Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > General > Manual or Auto?? |
|
|
The Doctor Member Since: 09 Jul 2010 Location: Gallifrey Posts: 4615 |
Good point well made Iain LL.B (Hons) - University of Derby LOT (Lord of Time) - University of Gallifrey |
||
11th Jan 2011 10:24 am |
|
weirdfish Member Since: 26 Dec 2010 Location: Hadleigh, Essex Posts: 196 |
I had an RX-8 that had a little buzzer to let you know to change up which was actually quite useful. Mind you, it was at about 9.5k rpm. |
||
11th Jan 2011 11:13 am |
|
The Doctor Member Since: 09 Jul 2010 Location: Gallifrey Posts: 4615 |
Spot on blackthorn. The green light is irritating because the thing about driving a manual is you get to know the car. You are at one with the machine . I could practically drive the car using the force Anyway, the point is that we know what gear is best for what speed the light is trying to save fuel but when you get to 50mph in 5th it says change up but that labours the engine (more so up hill but the light still says change), stupid thing. I came from FL1 ownership but prior to that I owned a Fiesta ST and I was amazed by the similarities with the FL2 gear change. Very short throw change, smooth and the stick itself is short and sporty rather than the more agricultural style gear stick in the FL1 manual. LR did a sound job LL.B (Hons) - University of Derby LOT (Lord of Time) - University of Gallifrey |
||
11th Jan 2011 11:16 am |
|
Andy131 Member Since: 09 Dec 2009 Location: Manchester Posts: 2183 |
Just for a balanced opinion couldn't disagree more. The auto is superb, it lets you concentrate on driving, especially off road, where you need to be concentrating where the wheels are rather than worring about frying the weak pathetic clutch. Used to drive 45k a year, only manage 30k now as work gets in the way, love driving, will never go back to a manual FL. Left knee is shot so clutch work hurts, but the initial reason for going for the auto was changing clutches on our original FL1 in the rain outside the house. Told you it was a balanced relpy Tangiers Orange - gone, missing her Replaced by Ewok what a mistake - now a happy Disco Sport owner |
||
11th Jan 2011 1:10 pm |
|
Captain Worm Member Since: 12 Sep 2010 Location: Solihull Posts: 969 |
I'm not even disputing that on some cars manuals are better - I like a good manual and to feel as one with the car when driving but what I am saying is that the auto better suits the FL. Freelander 2 TD4 Auto, SE, Narvik Black, Alpaca full leather, Rear Headrest Entertainment System, 6 CD, 18 HSE Wheels, Privicy tints |
||
11th Jan 2011 1:18 pm |
|
weirdfish Member Since: 26 Dec 2010 Location: Hadleigh, Essex Posts: 196 |
So where are we? Auto or Manual?
|
||
11th Jan 2011 1:19 pm |
|
The Doctor Member Since: 09 Jul 2010 Location: Gallifrey Posts: 4615 |
Auto is definitely best for off roading or towing but other than that its manual everytime. Much more controlled and refined than having to put up with jerky gearchange of the auto on kickdown and it feels more settled in top gear. Plus diesels dont rev when accelerating like a petrol does but the auto holds onto gears for too long when accerlerating quickly. Nice short throw on the manual too.
|
||
11th Jan 2011 1:27 pm |
|
weirdfish Member Since: 26 Dec 2010 Location: Hadleigh, Essex Posts: 196 |
The problem with the manuals, they suffer from dashboard problems |
||
11th Jan 2011 1:30 pm |
|
fujifreel Member Since: 06 Jan 2011 Location: Australian Capital Territory Posts: 14 |
Used the diesel ratios from the AUS MY11 brochure (assuming they are correct) and 235/65/17 tires (2316mm circumference) which shows:- manual 6th - 0.540, final drive ratio - 4.53 auto 6th - 0.686, final drive ratio - 3.329 rpm @ 100km/h:- manual = 1760 auto = 1643 |
||
11th Jan 2011 1:33 pm |
|
Tandemman Member Since: 30 Jun 2007 Location: Barnsley Posts: 686 |
I have had both manual and auto The manual I covered about 60,000 miles if I remember correctly, and the auto I have covered 28,000 so far.
|
||
11th Jan 2011 2:07 pm |
|
Captain Worm Member Since: 12 Sep 2010 Location: Solihull Posts: 969 |
There we go fact! not only AUTO's quicker to 60, rev less at 70, more refined, easier to drive, more relaxed, better off roading, better towing (not that I care ), more reliable (no clutches to replace), have better status, easier to sell, higher residual (I might have made this up ) and overall - just better The only thing I can see not in its favour is cost... but then if you factor in a new clutch every say 60k miles??? I wonder what happens to the TCO then? Also - when it comes to something as subjective as this, IMO cost becomes a mute point Freelander 2 TD4 Auto, SE, Narvik Black, Alpaca full leather, Rear Headrest Entertainment System, 6 CD, 18 HSE Wheels, Privicy tints |
||
11th Jan 2011 2:17 pm |
|
The Doctor Member Since: 09 Jul 2010 Location: Gallifrey Posts: 4615 |
Sorry Captain Worm you are way off the mark, the other guy came up with figures that showed the manual revs less and I have driven both so I know it does.
|
||
11th Jan 2011 2:30 pm |
|
Tandemman Member Since: 30 Jun 2007 Location: Barnsley Posts: 686 |
A well thought out and reasoned response again, does using capital letters make an opinion a fact |
||
11th Jan 2011 2:52 pm |
|
andyfr Member Since: 05 Jul 2010 Location: UK - Highlands Posts: 144 |
As I haven't any idea what revs a manual does I can't compare, but these are the details from my TD4 auto:
|
||
11th Jan 2011 2:56 pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis