Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > General > Things we spend our money on. |
|
|
Steve D Member Since: 19 Jan 2013 Location: Essexshire Posts: 4109 |
We have a monthly standing order for cancer research (£18 ) and St Francis hospice (£3) and have done for as long as I can remember. Not much, but regular and every little helps. We also strongly support a charity set up and run by our Sister-in-Law on behalf of our niece, Emily, who passed away at a very young age. http://port-charity.org.uk Past: FL2 TD4 HSE Auto
|
||
9th Apr 2016 6:46 pm |
|
Mikey Member Since: 07 Jun 2008 Location: Dundee Posts: 780 |
If the Directors of these charities were not being paid so much, I expect more people would be willing to donate...
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/582911/ch...live-Cooke |
||
9th Apr 2016 6:50 pm |
|
Steve D Member Since: 19 Jan 2013 Location: Essexshire Posts: 4109 |
I didn't think Directors of charities can receive wages. Employees can but directors/trustees or whatever they are called can only claim expenses. Past: FL2 TD4 HSE Auto
|
||
9th Apr 2016 6:54 pm |
|
j77 Member Since: 26 Nov 2008 Location: Fife Posts: 2909 |
Cancer research spend a large portion of their donations on staff wages. I'll put money in their buckets/tins if they are collecting.
|
||
9th Apr 2016 7:23 pm |
|
dorsetfreelander Member Since: 20 Jul 2013 Location: Dorset Posts: 4354 |
Actually I have just stopped my Cancer Research UK direct debit as I saw that the CEO is on £240K and I also had an email saying that they were doing cancer support services and helplines - which is not what I thought I was donating for. I am currently looking at sending a regular donation to specific Cancer Research group. 3 x FL1 2 manual + 1 auto
|
||
9th Apr 2016 7:40 pm |
|
alpacaman Member Since: 27 Mar 2016 Location: Norwich, UK Posts: 67 |
You're correct about Trustees (I have been one), but the chief executive and other senior management (certainly of larger charities) *are* employees and are salaried. Charities don't really have directors like companies do (although they often have trading arms which look after trading activities like shops, mail order, christmas cards, etc., which are limited companies, and some of the Trustees may be directors of those). Having served as a Trustee and SWMBO having worked as a senior fundraiser for many large charities (Barnardo's, Cancer Research, etc.) as well as small ones, I will only now give to small charities and only then once I have reviewed their annual reports (all publicly available on the Charity Commission) to see what percentage of their income is voluntary, and how much of that voluntary income goes directly towards their charitable aims and operations. |
||
9th Apr 2016 8:29 pm |
|
yorkshirepudding Member Since: 20 Feb 2016 Location: Yorkshire Posts: 63 |
I wouldn't believe a word that rag says, it's barely better than the tripe the Daily Mail turns out. However it always amazes me how we expect public/voluntary sector organisations to be run efficiently but begrudge them paying competitive salaries. Rather than worry too much about the salaries of those at the top I'm more bothered about the good work they do and that is why I won't donate to Macmillan or the RSPCA as my personal experience has been woeful. Whereas the local hospice does outstanding work. If I found out those at the top of my chosen charities had investments in a secret Panamanian company that would be a different matter. |
||
9th Apr 2016 10:12 pm |
|
dorsetfreelander Member Since: 20 Jul 2013 Location: Dorset Posts: 4354 |
I used to donate to one of the "sponsor a child" charities in Africa. Part of their website talked about drought and famine in Zambia. Then when my son worked in Zambia and often traveled in remote parts he came back saying that he hadn't seen any drought at all (it rains for 6 months of the year) and certainly no famine (although people were not well fed). I wrote to them and challenged what was on the website and they changed it. Made me suspicious of everything they did and a couple of other things came up so I stopped donating. I think the thing is to find charities who actually deliver or do what they say without branching out into other (sometimes political) areas. 3 x FL1 2 manual + 1 auto
|
||
9th Apr 2016 10:25 pm |
|
EYorkshire Member Since: 18 Nov 2010 Location: (!) Posts: 4392 |
Some would deem it offensive that you have 'generalised' us, where is your evidence that people who spend money on fancy wheels and iPhones etc do not not donate to charities. I'm not exactly into modding my car but do have Evoque wheels plus I have my 'favourite' charities, that are local to me including animal charities.
|
||
10th Apr 2016 8:13 am |
|
Badger51 Member Since: 01 Mar 2014 Location: Coffs Harbour Posts: 959 |
Sorry dorset but I have to totally agree with EYorkshires post.
|
||
10th Apr 2016 8:33 am |
|
dorsetfreelander Member Since: 20 Jul 2013 Location: Dorset Posts: 4354 |
I am not having a a go at anyone here, you can spend your money on what you like. My original point was that people (myself included) are happy to spend some of their money on toys and trinkets rather than spend that money on medical research that could ultimately help them.
|
||
10th Apr 2016 8:57 am |
|
Steve D Member Since: 19 Jan 2013 Location: Essexshire Posts: 4109 |
Thing is, you could say that about everything. For example, when buying your car or house, why didn't you buy one for half as much and put the rest to good use? Going on holiday this year? While people in the world are dying of thirst and hunger? Tut tut......and so on. Where do you stop? Past: FL2 TD4 HSE Auto Evoque SD4 Dynamic Lux Auto Present: Audi A3 S Line. |
||
10th Apr 2016 12:40 pm |
|
alpacaman Member Since: 27 Mar 2016 Location: Norwich, UK Posts: 67 |
I agree. The reality is that for many of us it's not a case of "rather than" as the OP suggests, but of "as well as". We might well spend money on fancy wheels, the latest iPhone, etc. but that doesn't necessarily mean we don't also make donations to causes that we care about that might help others right now, or us or our families in the future. What bugs me more is those people who moan about not having enough money to pay their rent/mortgage, put food on the table for their families, etc. yet consider the latest mobiles, TVs and Sky as being "necessities" that they have to have. |
||
10th Apr 2016 12:48 pm |
|
j77 Member Since: 26 Nov 2008 Location: Fife Posts: 2909 |
What gets me is these big charity events on TV, it used to be you gave what ever you could afford, now it's text to donate £5, £10, £20 etc.
|
||
10th Apr 2016 2:16 pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis