Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > General > Dual Mass Flywheels |
|
|
|
ChrisSoutham Member Since: 14 Sep 2011 Location: Kington St Michael, Chippenham Posts: 160 |
Hi guys, sorry to bring it up again but I'd appreciate anyone who could to fill out the brief poll below about your Dual Mass Flywheel. I'm trying to gain some sensible information about it's realistic lifespan having just replaced mine at 112k.
|
||
19th Jun 2014 12:37 pm |
|
WarriorBez Member Since: 29 Jan 2012 Location: rugby Posts: 539 |
106k miles and not replaced.......yet Black FL2
|
||
19th Jun 2014 12:38 pm |
|
littletriple Member Since: 27 Mar 2014 Location: kent Posts: 226 |
Maybe split the nope vote by mileage too? Maybe theyre all really low mileage... |
||
19th Jun 2014 3:01 pm |
|
Steve D Member Since: 19 Jan 2013 Location: Essexshire Posts: 4109 |
Nope, I bought an Auto. Past: FL2 TD4 HSE Auto
|
||
19th Jun 2014 4:27 pm |
|
rjc1944 Member Since: 18 Dec 2011 Location: Perranporth, Cornwall Posts: 783 |
Well done Steve. Me too! Ours - 2008 Stornoway Grey HSE Auto
|
||
19th Jun 2014 4:59 pm |
|
pab Member Since: 28 Aug 2012 Location: Now in Mid-Wales Posts: 2007 |
So you guys both pay the equivalent of a DMF replacement every year or two in increased fuel costs?
|
||
19th Jun 2014 5:14 pm |
|
cosmjd Member Since: 15 Jan 2011 Location: UK Posts: 19 |
1st at 7k. Second at 19k. Don't want to jinx third..... |
||
19th Jun 2014 6:33 pm |
|
Steve D Member Since: 19 Jan 2013 Location: Essexshire Posts: 4109 |
If we were worried about fuel costs we would have bought the poor mans Freelander! Past: FL2 TD4 HSE Auto Evoque SD4 Dynamic Lux Auto Present: Audi A3 S Line. |
||
19th Jun 2014 7:10 pm |
|
ad210358 Member Since: 12 Oct 2008 Location: Here and There Posts: 7464 |
I've had both, not much difference between the two. Certainly not enough to pay for a new DMF every year or two. |
||
19th Jun 2014 7:44 pm |
|
pab Member Since: 28 Aug 2012 Location: Now in Mid-Wales Posts: 2007 |
LR's own figures say 7mpg difference for the 160 engine. The mpg threads here suggest similar - maybe slightly less. That easily adds up to £500 plus per year if you do a reasonable mileage. Its not insignificant. Plus, of course, the auto costs £1500 more to start with. That's £4K over 5 years. Not that much relative to the other costs involved in running something like the FL2, but not a trivial sum either.
|
||
19th Jun 2014 8:20 pm |
|
ad210358 Member Since: 12 Oct 2008 Location: Here and There Posts: 7464 |
From personal experience, running an SD4 compared to the 160, it was only a couple of miles more to the gallon, if that. Was only getting 30 around town with the 160, certainly wasn't getting 23 with the SD4, the D4 does better than that. |
||
19th Jun 2014 8:29 pm |
|
pab Member Since: 28 Aug 2012 Location: Now in Mid-Wales Posts: 2007 |
The SD4 gets better mpg than the 160, so that's consistent. One has to compare like with like.
|
||
19th Jun 2014 8:34 pm |
|
Steve D Member Since: 19 Jan 2013 Location: Essexshire Posts: 4109 |
Can do both with the auto. If you really feel you have to. Past: FL2 TD4 HSE Auto Evoque SD4 Dynamic Lux Auto Present: Audi A3 S Line. |
||
19th Jun 2014 9:07 pm |
|
pab Member Since: 28 Aug 2012 Location: Now in Mid-Wales Posts: 2007 |
I know - I've owned autos. But its not the same. |
||
19th Jun 2014 9:28 pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis