Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > General > Discovery Sport Thread **ALL HERE** |
|
|
pab Member Since: 28 Aug 2012 Location: Now in Mid-Wales Posts: 2007 |
And it's only going to get worse for those of us who want a 'proper' Land Rover. Seems (as we've long expected) that the D5 will be little more than a re-bodied RRS
|
||
26th Oct 2015 10:00 am |
|
j77 Member Since: 26 Nov 2008 Location: Fife Posts: 2909 |
I'm still waiting for this different design language, which separates the ranges. 21MY Defender 90 S 3.0 D200 |
||
26th Oct 2015 11:16 am |
|
Dartman the one Member Since: 04 Apr 2013 Location: Seville, Spain Posts: 1687 |
Well the roof line is high, the hatch seems to be of a practical shape for loading the big bits and stowing big dogs, aesthetics are personal, the main thing for an LR is a practical lugger that will continue to keep going when all else have failed, whether snow, ice, flood or mud, the problem is LR failed to grasp that with the DS my PC is slightly to the right of Genghis
|
||
26th Oct 2015 11:57 am |
|
Landroverfan1 Member Since: 16 Jun 2015 Location: London Posts: 56 |
I honestly struggle these days to tell the newer models apart, until I see the lettering. |
||
26th Oct 2015 3:16 pm |
|
Walenut Member Since: 17 Jun 2012 Location: Midlands Posts: 116 |
Not sure I agree with that, keep being told that inflation is in negative figures & I haven't had a pay rise above 1% since 2007, I won't be able to afford a 30 grand plus DS. |
||
26th Oct 2015 8:56 pm |
|
GSKM Member Since: 05 Aug 2015 Location: Deepest darkest Shropshire Posts: 128 |
Just a couple of quick questions; What was the original Discovery evolved from? What was the original RRS evolved from? Designing the chassis takes a huge amount of time and money, if LR can use and adapt a current chassis it will make the product cheaper. They can tune each vehicle to specific requirements. Would you want to pay for a bespoke chassis when there is a perfectly good one that can be tweaked? Look at the VAG group cars, many share the same chassis and components. GAV. |
||
27th Oct 2015 8:13 am |
|
Dartman the one Member Since: 04 Apr 2013 Location: Seville, Spain Posts: 1687 |
I don't think the chassis is the problem, though it seems as LR will have 2 chassis or underpinning designs, one aluminium and the other steel , the alloy will be for the larger vehicles and the steel for the smaller vehicles and probably stretched for the Defender replacement.
|
||
27th Oct 2015 8:55 am |
|
pab Member Since: 28 Aug 2012 Location: Now in Mid-Wales Posts: 2007 |
Not necessarily if the starting point is the very expensive aluminium RR platform. We can expect to see the D5 costing close to RRS money, and that will move it firmly into luxury road car territory. And if speculation on the defender2 forum is correct the new Defender might use that platofrm too, and it too will see a huge price hike. In this case a new chassis for the D5 and Defender might well have resulted in LR having the option to price the vehicles (particularly Defender) more attractively, as well as giving them a far more flexible line-up. As it is they'll potentially have just two platforms - one very expensive and one relatively cheap - with nothing in the middle. That fits their current marketing strategy, but only time will tell if that strategy is going to work. |
||
27th Oct 2015 10:21 am |
|
j77 Member Since: 26 Nov 2008 Location: Fife Posts: 2909 |
I believe the new Disco will be based on the D7u platform which is what the FFRR and RRS2 is based on, so there is your first expense, then technology that nobody really wants is your next big expense. There is rumours of a £7k price hike over the current model, if true then this will be my last LR. The biggest issue is weight, the current Disco is a heavy beast so I expect a fair bit of weight loss. 21MY Defender 90 S 3.0 D200 |
||
27th Oct 2015 11:19 am |
|
wjohnm Member Since: 10 May 2014 Location: Glos Posts: 84 |
If weight is the main issue D5 should be much lighter. Aluminium monocoque will be much lighter than steel chassis plus steel monocoque on D4 T5 platform. However that has to cost!!
|
||
27th Oct 2015 12:47 pm |
|
Dartman the one Member Since: 04 Apr 2013 Location: Seville, Spain Posts: 1687 |
Though the alloy monocoque is more expensive than a steel one the difference is not that great once the development costs have been discounted, JLR have been producing alloy monocoques since 2004 with the last of the old XJ saloons and continue to the present the FFRR being the first of the alloy LR derived models. The price of a RR or LR is not so much based on the manufacturing costs, but how much will the market stand and how much is put aside per model for customer service i.e 50% contribution to a 2007 model differential repair. my PC is slightly to the right of Genghis
|
||
27th Oct 2015 1:46 pm |
|
GSKM Member Since: 05 Aug 2015 Location: Deepest darkest Shropshire Posts: 128 |
Original Disco was a RR in a new suit. Chassis was tweaked, front inner wings the same, windscreen the same. Look at how many "strange rovers" or "Rearranged Rovers" appeared in the late 90 or early 00. The Series 3 was a leaf sprung vehicle which was tweaked from the series 2. The disco and series vehicles have no commonality. The 110 and 90s were coil sprung way before the Disco was around. Chassis development costs a huge amount. Yes FFRR may have an expensive chassis, but if LR can use it for other vehicles is that not a saving against development cost, therefore a saving to us the customers? Until we see the next defender any discussion is speculation |
||
27th Oct 2015 7:36 pm |
|
Dartman the one Member Since: 04 Apr 2013 Location: Seville, Spain Posts: 1687 |
I bow to your superior knowledge regarding the Disco 200 however the Series 3 chassis though leaf sprung must have had a lot in common with the Defender as a guy I knew put a series 3 body on a 110 chassis. my PC is slightly to the right of Genghis
|
||
27th Oct 2015 8:32 pm |
|
Rnd2 Member Since: 06 Apr 2015 Location: South wales Posts: 95 |
I like the FL2 its my second one ,and probably my last ,i had the same thing with my second Jag 2.2 6 speed xtype ,they stoped making them ,now they do this again ,i would never have bought one if i was better informed,idont want a seven seater car i dont want an evoke ,i wanted another Freelander ,next year ,but it wont happen ,very disappointed wthe Jaguar Landrover 👹👹👹 |
||
27th Oct 2015 10:18 pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis