Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > Technical > Is the MPG increase between MY2010 & MY2011 really that |
|
|
fredastaire Member Since: 03 Dec 2012 Location: Holbrook Posts: 721 |
This thread started by saying 'I know the engines changed' between 2010 - 2011 years.
|
||
26th Jun 2013 10:55 pm |
|
Badger1970 Member Since: 21 Sep 2012 Location: Southam, Warwickshire Posts: 1372 |
For what it's worth, this might be a bit of interesting reading in regards to the improved 2011 engine.
|
||
27th Jun 2013 7:24 am |
|
Spanky Deluxe Member Since: 29 May 2013 Location: London Posts: 13 |
A bit of an update. We ended up saving some cash and went for an Approved Used 57 reg TD4 HSE Freely in Rimini Red. We've been seriously impressed with the mileage we've been getting out of it. My wife's daily commute across London is costing us only 32 mpg. I had it up at over 40 for a while shortly after refuelling and resetting on the M25 at 70. For that same 32mpg drive, our X5 did about 22 and the Mini Cooper S about 24/5. Very impressed. I'm so surprised at how good it is that I wonder if the previous owner got the car remapped and Landrover didn't know about this when they sold it to us! |
||
23rd Jul 2013 11:02 pm |
|
chrisr1806 Member Since: 20 Oct 2012 Location: None Posts: 2220 |
Great to hear.
|
||
24th Jul 2013 8:05 am |
|
ad210358 Member Since: 12 Oct 2008 Location: Here and There Posts: 7464 |
I started reading Spanky's post and thought here we go again, someone else has bought a two ton brick and wants 70 to the gallon, what a refreshing change, some one with realistic hopes and gets a nice surprise p****d off with a Digital Keyboard Warrior |
||
24th Jul 2013 4:56 pm |
|
fredastaire Member Since: 03 Dec 2012 Location: Holbrook Posts: 721 |
Just as an add on to my previous reply...
|
||
24th Jul 2013 5:49 pm |
|
Spanky Deluxe Member Since: 29 May 2013 Location: London Posts: 13 |
Haha, anyone expecting manufacturer stated mpg from a vehicle is a fool. In my experience most manufacturers claim a mpg about 30-40% above real world usage figures. This is the first time I've ever driven a vehicle that has better mpg figures than the manufacturer claims - urban is meant to be 26.4 mpg according to Land Rover, not the 32 mpg that we've been getting for urban driving!! MPG improvements are a bit of a false economy in urban areas anyway. If you live in London, you might think that a 40 mpg car would be massively better than a 30 mpg car and worth spending extra or changing vehicle for. In reality though, if your commute is only 10 miles Mon-Fri (i.e. about 5000 miles per year), then you'd only be saving about 」250 a year in fuel. I know people who don't use their cars every day and probably only do a few thousand miles worth of driving a year who have sold their cars for more economical ones without realising what the actual cost 'savings' might be. |
||
25th Jul 2013 1:54 pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis