Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > Off Topic > 1,000,000th Discovery |
|
|
alex_pescaru Member Since: 12 Mar 2009 Location: RO Posts: 4642 |
|
||
12th Apr 2012 4:23 pm |
|
Big Dave Member Since: 22 Nov 2009 Location: Yorkshire Posts: 1055 |
You liked the TD5 but though the D3 was underpowered...the D3 would run rings round a TD5! I think the D4 looks a bit too blingy...D3 was designed, D4 they just added fairy lights and shiny parts which don't work. Mine: 2012 Golf GTI Edition 35 Family's: 2009 Freelander 2 HSE TD4 Auto, Stornoway Yorkshire - God's County |
||
13th Apr 2012 9:11 am |
|
Dave Member Since: 04 Jul 2007 Location: Somewhere Near You Posts: 2666 |
Whilst the D3 was/is a great 4x4 it is seriously dated now and isn't a patch on the D4.
|
||
13th Apr 2012 7:56 pm |
|
Tigger Member Since: 30 Mar 2011 Location: L15KRD Posts: 2555 |
If the funds could run to it, I would love a Disco 4. Back in the real world I'm happy to "make do" with the Freelander though
|
||
13th Apr 2012 8:18 pm |
|
philsh Member Since: 20 Sep 2008 Location: Between a rock and a hard place Posts: 537 |
More fond memories really, back in the days when 4x4's were meant to be gutless. The D3 is a nice enough car, but was always destined to be lacklustre, only having 10% more torque than the FL2, but weighing in at the best part of tonne more. I drive one at work and find it hard going, but it sounds nice. The D4 is the complete package. The looks may not be everyone's taste, but it's one hell of a nice, relaxing car to drive. It's everything the D3 should have been. The performance and economy figures speak for themselves. Personal choice I guess Gone - TD4 XS Auto, Sumatra Black, Mud flaps and side strips, clear indicators, private plate, privacy glass |
||
13th Apr 2012 9:45 pm |
|
chrisdeeming Member Since: 29 Dec 2011 Location: Sutton Coldfield Posts: 828 |
D3 and D4 look crap in my opinion the side looks awful just a big slab of metal. Anyway guys for your information Land Rover was really struggling in the 1980's and early 90's until they bought out the discovery one. Personally I think they're great motors, if it wasn't for these cars we wouldn't have the D4. You cant compare a 20 year old car to the D4. |
||
14th Apr 2012 6:40 am |
|
Tigger Member Since: 30 Mar 2011 Location: L15KRD Posts: 2555 |
chrisdeeming:
|
||
14th Apr 2012 6:57 am |
|
JST Member Since: 01 Nov 2011 Location: Lizant Posts: 1098 |
What you say about the S1 is quite true Tigger but it worked! I had a S! for years and loved it. It saved Land Rover from financial meltdown and they had to raid other people's parts bins to build the thing due to money being tight. The door catches/locks were all GM from the Bedford CF van I think. The 200 Tdi motor was a gem but even so the design team had to lie to senior management to get it built. I think they said they were just re-designing the crank from the 2.5 TD. John
|
||
14th Apr 2012 10:30 am |
|
Tigger Member Since: 30 Mar 2011 Location: L15KRD Posts: 2555 |
Like I say, don't get me wrong here; being critical of the S1 & S2 Disco is like criticising an old friend
|
||
14th Apr 2012 11:11 pm |
|
chrisdeeming Member Since: 29 Dec 2011 Location: Sutton Coldfield Posts: 828 |
hehehe anyway so we all agree that they were good cars. Back to the discussion in hand, the d4 is a good car I just cant help feel landrover are moving away from real 4x4's to blinged up chrome beasts with fairy lights lol. I know they have to move on and change with the times and to be fair the cars still do the job. I am just going to miss the old styles, maybe I'm just getting old ( in my 20's ) lol... |
||
15th Apr 2012 8:31 am |
|
Tigger Member Since: 30 Mar 2011 Location: L15KRD Posts: 2555 |
If only there was room for this one in my garage
|
||
15th Apr 2012 9:07 am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis