|
|
| Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
 | Home > Off Topic > Riots |
 
|
|
|
| athelstan Member Since: 03 Nov 2009 Location: Reality Posts: 2658  |
Legal Defence: reasonable force your Honour in due of the mob of 20+ Yobos carrying baseball bats n sticks n bricks etc., intent on doing harm to my family. Note: such an excuse is in the statute books and in the "Green Book". Note 2: don't know what the Green Book is - ask "The Doctor" - if he really does know his law and has been paying attention at lectures  Last edited by athelstan on 9th Aug 2011 7:22 pm. Edited 1 time in total |
||
9th Aug 2011 7:18 pm |
|
| The Doctor Member Since: 09 Jul 2010 Location: Gallifrey Posts: 4615 
|
Perhaps the police could drive a Marauder into the crowd to disperse them, like the one Hammond drove on Top Gear.
|
||
|
9th Aug 2011 7:19 pm |
|
| superspark Member Since: 24 May 2009 Location: Devon Posts: 877 
|
In most counties when there is looting on mass, I thought the army shot them. white, black, red, yellow what ever the the skin there rapped in.
|
||
|
9th Aug 2011 7:23 pm |
|
| athelstan Member Since: 03 Nov 2009 Location: Reality Posts: 2658 |
You can describe them accurately as a multiethnic gathering bent on destruction and theft. As it was. |
||
|
9th Aug 2011 7:24 pm |
|
| The Doctor Member Since: 09 Jul 2010 Location: Gallifrey Posts: 4615
|
Never heard of it and it's never been mentioned in lectures. Google throws up various results on it. Interestingly, there was that incident recently where a man was arrested for murder having killed a member of a yob gang who broke into his house armed with machete's. The CPS did not take any action as he had acted in self defence in genuine fear for his own life and that of his family. The rest of the gang were charged with aggravated burglary and offensive weapons etc. Chalk one up for the good guys. LL.B (Hons) - University of Derby LOT (Lord of Time) - University of Gallifrey |
||
|
9th Aug 2011 7:26 pm |
|
| athelstan Member Since: 03 Nov 2009 Location: Reality Posts: 2658 |
It is not illegal - it is just that the Home Office and the Police Federation currently find not evidence that it is truly effect as a dispersal tool. It is indiscriminate in use and cannot be guaranteed not to harm the innocent. |
||
|
9th Aug 2011 7:27 pm |
|
| The Doctor Member Since: 09 Jul 2010 Location: Gallifrey Posts: 4615
|
Baton rounds aka rubber bullets are on the agenda next if it gets worse. LL.B (Hons) - University of Derby LOT (Lord of Time) - University of Gallifrey |
||
|
9th Aug 2011 7:29 pm |
|
| Dave Member Since: 04 Jul 2007 Location: Somewhere Near You Posts: 2666  
|
Real bullets would be better, at least you would only have to shoot once. It's about time the ethnic minority was "thinned out" in this country:evil: ______________________
|
||
|
9th Aug 2011 7:32 pm |
|
| athelstan Member Since: 03 Nov 2009 Location: Reality Posts: 2658 |
Never heard of "The Green Book" - my dear chap every legal practice has their "Green Book" library - reports case law precedent. 
|
||
|
9th Aug 2011 7:35 pm |
|
| athelstan Member Since: 03 Nov 2009 Location: Reality Posts: 2658 |
Since when was Google the adjudicator of English law. Ask the Law Lords or the Supreme Court - not a bloody web search engine. You'll not progress far at the Bar my dear chap if you defer to Google. First the Green Book, then move on challenging the County Court Magistrate and so on until you are no longer in deference to the Bench and continually saying "I'm obliged your Honour"
|
||
|
9th Aug 2011 7:42 pm |
|
| The Doctor Member Since: 09 Jul 2010 Location: Gallifrey Posts: 4615
|
Green book library, case reports etc of course. I thought you meant a specific book, you threw me there. For example: Sym v Stretch (1936) 2 All ER 1237. This means volume 2 of the All England Law Reports starting at page 1237, reported in 1936. It's a defamation case which resulted in Lord Atkin's definition of a defamation. Also, the 'v' does not mean versus. In civil cases it means 'and'. In criminal cases it means 'against'. R v Horncastle is spoken as The Crown against Horncastle. LL.B (Hons) - University of Derby LOT (Lord of Time) - University of Gallifrey |
||
|
9th Aug 2011 7:49 pm |
|
| athelstan Member Since: 03 Nov 2009 Location: Reality Posts: 2658 |
Doc
|
||
|
9th Aug 2011 7:52 pm |
|
| The Doctor Member Since: 09 Jul 2010 Location: Gallifrey Posts: 4615
|
I suspect by the time I reach that level of skill/knowledge (if I reach it), Silk will mean KC as opposed to QC! LL.B (Hons) - University of Derby LOT (Lord of Time) - University of Gallifrey |
||
|
9th Aug 2011 8:01 pm |
|
| athelstan Member Since: 03 Nov 2009 Location: Reality Posts: 2658 |
No - it will be PC - The Peoples' Council if the detritus marauding the byways of Blighty are not checked in their ways within the next 72hrs. I'm no fan of the House of Windsor but a Peoples' Republic is always the first step on the downward spiral to a brutal repressive dictatorial regime that has no time for human rights or the niceties of the due process of law. And under such regimes there's no QC, KC or PC - just the DC and kiss your a** goodbye. |
||
|
9th Aug 2011 8:11 pm |
|
|
|
| All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
