Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > Off Topic > Is it April? |
|
|
taztastic Member Since: 03 Feb 2011 Location: North West Posts: 8652 |
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-28878432
|
||
21st Aug 2014 9:45 pm |
|
chapsworth Member Since: 03 Jan 2012 Location: Canterbury Posts: 225 |
Next it will be kettles won't be allowed to be more than 1KW...... |
||
21st Aug 2014 10:01 pm |
|
ccsnet Member Since: 05 Jan 2013 Location: Lancs Posts: 881 |
|
||
21st Aug 2014 10:15 pm |
|
richardk Member Since: 11 Jan 2009 Location: Norwich Posts: 909 |
We can feedback to them on May 7th 2015
|
||
22nd Aug 2014 5:55 am |
|
athelstan Member Since: 03 Nov 2009 Location: Reality Posts: 2658 |
Yes and No. Yes Taztastic - you drove the EU administrators to the state of legislating by demonstrating the wisdom of buying a new FL2 just because you lost the washer bottle cap on your old FL2. Perfect consumerist capitalism. With the whole of the EU's domestic markets in recession (see this week's EU data) they needed your expertise and fiscal bravado to direct to this keynote strategy to reinvigorate Europe's stagnant markets. Well done - on this basis you are very likey to be name in next year's Queen's birthday honours list. An OBE perhaps? No Taz - the rational behind the Eurocrats' thinking is not abundantly transparent. The vast majority of the vacuum cleaners on sale in Europe are driven by high powered, old technology, inefficient motors. Whereas there exists already far more efficient motors to undertake the same function in an environmentally friendlier manner. Mr Dyson knows this and does this. None of his motors are at or above the proposed redundant threshold. But being the wise owl that he is, he is also objecting to the legislation because within the proposal the criteria for redundancy does not take sufficient account of the efficiency of suction across different surfaces, the noise pollution generated under all work applications, and the environmental impact of continuing the non-renewable repetitive practise of manufacturing small individual paper bags to collect the dust; which are then dumped. In other words the whole proposal is ill conceived and should be dismissed as it presently stands. |
||
22nd Aug 2014 6:42 am |
|
EYorkshire Member Since: 18 Nov 2010 Location: (!) Posts: 4392 |
Most mainstream vacuums are old technology and its simpler to uprate the motor than invest time and labour into better efficiency. While the 'crats' should be concentrating on what we feel more important things, it is a 'boot up the arse' for manufacturers to not being so lazy and to follow Dyson's lead in technology.
|
||
22nd Aug 2014 8:07 am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis