Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > Off Topic > Debate - Ad Nauseum |
|
|
chicken george Member Since: 05 Dec 2007 Location: N. Yorks Posts: 13291 |
The plane moves at take off speed because it has jet engine pushing it through the air , the wheel conveyor thing is irrelevant. All that wheels on a plane do is stop it damaging its belly on take off/landing.
|
||
26th Jan 2012 10:31 am |
|
EYorkshire Member Since: 18 Nov 2010 Location: (!) Posts: 4392 |
It's not pushing it through the air, the plane is stationary, it's a bloody windless scenario, the only time it would take off is if it was all put in a wind tunnel. Taz, I hope you have a link to educate Mr George on this, he's letting Yorkshire down. |
||
26th Jan 2012 10:36 am |
|
npinks Member Since: 28 Jun 2007 Location: Ls25 Posts: 20092 |
Imagine a plane without wheels. The fuselage would sit on the runway, and as you fired up the engines, it would skid spectacularly along the runway, possibly spewing sparks in its wake and blow up No matter how fast it was going, the frictional force against the airplane would be constant; friction does not depend on speed! If the engines were strong enough to get the plane up to the critical take-off speed, then it would still take off. The only reason planes have wheels is to reduce this sliding friction. The wheels roll along the runway instead of sliding, and the only friction that the plane feels is in the bearings of the wheels. This is substantially less than the friction that a sliding fuselage would create, and it's a much smoother ride for the passengers as well. If you took out the friction from the wheels completely, whether thats the wheel bearing or deformation of the wheels through spinning, the wheels would spin in the opposite direction the power of the engine pulling the plane, will cause forward motion, plane moves at 200mph right, treadmill 200mph left, wheels travelling 400mph (or the equivalent rpm) the plane would be moving forward enough to provide airflow over its wings and generate lift. Its all down to fact if the plane can move forward to generate lift, to do this you have to overcome friction, whether that removing the law from the equation or overcoming it with excess power to negate friction in to forward propulsion so its down to plane physically having to move from point A to C, it can't sit there at point B with the floor moving fast below and take off as the airflow isn't there, if you then factored in the wind moving towards the plane it would factor in lift, hence the reason why test are done in wind tunnels, static object is provide with lift via the tunnels turbine cause the airflow. Former Mod/Member, with the most post & Chicken George Arch nemesis |
||
26th Jan 2012 10:41 am |
|
jp Member Since: 11 May 2009 Location: North East Posts: 432 |
Dose nobody on this site ever watch Mythbusters on Discovery . because that's what there sort out !!
|
||
26th Jan 2012 10:48 am |
|
jp Member Since: 11 May 2009 Location: North East Posts: 432 |
watch this it may help !!
|
||
26th Jan 2012 10:53 am |
|
npinks Member Since: 28 Jun 2007 Location: Ls25 Posts: 20092 |
The plane wasnt kept static in the MB episode and the small scale test wasn't a real life situation
|
||
26th Jan 2012 10:58 am |
|
chicken george Member Since: 05 Dec 2007 Location: N. Yorks Posts: 13291 |
bottom of tank track doesnt travel it stays still the idler wheels move along the track At work
|
||
26th Jan 2012 11:48 am |
|
chicken george Member Since: 05 Dec 2007 Location: N. Yorks Posts: 13291 |
can someone please explain how they think a flat conveyor belt is transferring enough energy to the planes wheels to overcome the forward thrust of the propeller/jet. At work
|
||
26th Jan 2012 12:28 pm |
|
npinks Member Since: 28 Jun 2007 Location: Ls25 Posts: 20092 |
its all how you perceive the word treadmill, ie running on the spot
|
||
26th Jan 2012 1:02 pm |
|
EYorkshire Member Since: 18 Nov 2010 Location: (!) Posts: 4392 |
Your'e right Nick, the treadmill matches exactly the speed of the accelerating plane, so the plane is stationary.
|
||
26th Jan 2012 1:20 pm |
|
npinks Member Since: 28 Jun 2007 Location: Ls25 Posts: 20092 |
so basically the pilot would have to keep he plane at the same speed of the 2 mile conveyor belt (treadmill is too small) to prevent backwards movement and that shows the pilot is not trying to take off Former Mod/Member, with the most post & Chicken George Arch nemesis |
||
26th Jan 2012 1:31 pm |
|
chicken george Member Since: 05 Dec 2007 Location: N. Yorks Posts: 13291 |
stand on a tread mill with roller skates on you will stay stationary with ease, someone could push you forwards with not much more effort than if you were a stationary treadmill, put a rocket on your back and you travel forwards hit the control panel and bang your nose, serves you right At work
|
||
26th Jan 2012 2:36 pm |
|
EYorkshire Member Since: 18 Nov 2010 Location: (!) Posts: 4392 |
But the question states
No matter how hard you push or the force of the rocket, the treadmill is programmed to match that speed so therefore it will remain motionless. |
||
26th Jan 2012 2:51 pm |
|
chicken george Member Since: 05 Dec 2007 Location: N. Yorks Posts: 13291 |
but the treadmill isnt slowing you down its simply spinning the wheels At work
|
||
26th Jan 2012 2:54 pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis