Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > General > Freelander Si4 |
|
|
mini-eggs Member Since: 11 Jan 2010 Location: S.Wales Posts: 187 |
I do hope you are right that it is the VX engine. My wallet may get twitchy if it turns out to be happening.
|
||
6th Dec 2010 12:39 pm |
|
Mav71 Member Since: 15 Nov 2008 Location: Leicester Posts: 2575 |
There was talk of it being the Ford Ecoboost 2.0 Turbo, but apparently it's not designed to run with 4x4 applications. Freelander 2 HSE Lux 2013MY - Barolo Black with Ivory Leather. Alpine DVD - Privacy -Evoque 20" Dynamic Wheels and more to come......... |
||
6th Dec 2010 1:03 pm |
|
mini-eggs Member Since: 11 Jan 2010 Location: S.Wales Posts: 187 |
Not that it would happen, but imagine the 2.8L engine from the vx insignia vxr, with a few little tuning goodies, that would 1 insane Freelander. |
||
6th Dec 2010 1:43 pm |
|
npinks Member Since: 28 Jun 2007 Location: Ls25 Posts: 20090 |
can't see it happening myself, after all the competition is generating its more powerful cars via diesels, like the 3.0 tdi Q5, and they want to keep the petrol for the more sporty Evoque IMO
|
||
6th Dec 2010 1:49 pm |
|
Mav71 Member Since: 15 Nov 2008 Location: Leicester Posts: 2575 |
The 2.8 V6 A28 NET turbo engine is good without a doubt, but 350bhp is about as far as you can go before you start needing engine internals. The A20 NET 2.0 Turbo is good for 330bhp with standard injectors, but 340 is possible with different injectors. Opel recently did a test at the Nurburgring with two Insignia's, a 2.8 V6 Turbo with 260bhp and a 2.0 Turbo which had a re-map to 260bhp, the 2.0 car was quicker, handles better, better mpg and lower on the emmisions. So for me a decent spec 2.0 Turbo is the way forward. Land Rover did evaluate the Volvo 3.0 straight 6 Turbo from the XC60 T6 for the Freelander 2. It is is effect the same engine as the 3.2 i6, but as Volvo and LR could not agree on a common Turbo charger for the both application's, it never made production. They figured that there would be no point in building the same engine with two difference turbochargers,. 300bhp was the figure being rumoured. Freelander 2 HSE Lux 2013MY - Barolo Black with Ivory Leather. Alpine DVD - Privacy -Evoque 20" Dynamic Wheels and more to come......... |
||
6th Dec 2010 2:45 pm |
|
Huang Member Since: 20 Nov 2009 Location: Melbourne Posts: 86 |
The trend is to build smaller capacity engines with turbos, s/c. Everyone is crazy about lowering fuel emissions. It does make sence, just look at the Golf R. Too bad LR doesn't have the turbo six, would of been something. |
||
7th Dec 2010 3:06 am |
|
themightymcphed Member Since: 02 Dec 2010 Location: Airdrie Posts: 56 |
It's the Ford ecoboost engine that the Evoque is getting. Doubt we'll see it in a Freelander. They'll want to keep the brands differentiated a bit.
|
||
10th Dec 2010 5:14 pm |
|
heliosuk Member Since: 08 Oct 2010 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 118 |
If it's true I expect it will be the Mazda engine that goes in the FL2. No way will it be a GM engine as general commercial agreements with the Ford sale agreement won't allow it. |
||
10th Dec 2010 11:34 pm |
|
athelstan Member Since: 03 Nov 2009 Location: Reality Posts: 2658 |
Take a close look at the CV of the Boss of LR and you'll discover that there is every possibility that it could be a GM unit. |
||
11th Dec 2010 9:16 am |
|
Mav71 Member Since: 15 Nov 2008 Location: Leicester Posts: 2575 |
It is interesting what is said here, from what I have read, the Ford Ecoboost engine is not designed for 4 wheel drive applications, and the GM link keeps popping up! Freelander 2 HSE Lux 2013MY - Barolo Black with Ivory Leather. Alpine DVD - Privacy -Evoque 20" Dynamic Wheels and more to come......... |
||
12th Dec 2010 6:22 pm |
|
Natwest Member Since: 06 Oct 2008 Location: North Cotswolds Posts: 576 |
so Ford Ecoboost won't appear in Kuga? |
||
12th Dec 2010 8:22 pm |
|
ad210358 Member Since: 12 Oct 2008 Location: Here and There Posts: 7464 |
I would be surprised to see Ford either put another petrol unit in the line up or drop the 2.5 that is currently in it, not many manufacturers have more than one petrol unit in the range with the big shift to diesel in the last few years. |
||
13th Dec 2010 6:59 pm |
|
Oscr Member Since: 18 Jan 2010 Location: Europe Posts: 68 |
Personally I would prefer a creamy 2,5-2,8 L V6 diesel, with about 200-220 bhp, mated to a DSG-type gearbox.
|
||
13th Dec 2010 7:54 pm |
|
Huang Member Since: 20 Nov 2009 Location: Melbourne Posts: 86 |
I read this somewhere:
|
||
14th Dec 2010 1:24 am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis