one for LRNUT maybe ??

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/money/cars/arti...tible.html

A bit too bling bling for me is it actually 6 wheel drive however? Fabric roof is no good up here will leak like sive : if they made a hard top soft top I may have been interested  MY14 Kahn Converted Dynamic - Fuji White Ebony/Pimento Interior
MY15 Xenon Headlight Conversion

MY17 RRS SVR - Estoril Blue Cirrus/Ebony 🪣💺’s

Mmm, Kahn, the pinnacle of good taste.... Updated- Waiting for a Scotland v England 6 Nations home win. 24th Feb 2018
Gone-1972 88 SWB Soft top
Gone-1981 24v FFR Lightweight
Gone-2009 Freelander 2 TD4 GS manual
Gone before it bankrupted me- 2008 Discovery 3 TDV6 Auto
2013 Freelander 2 SD4 GS Auto

http://www.kahndesign.com/news/news_detail...YBfgYTyuJA


how about this one then LRNUT ?..... its a bit cheaper and you can fit plenty of sheep in the back of that

Rear wheels are very close to each other and it looks almost tread to tread.
Bearing in mind that [at point of potential contact] each tread will be going in the opposite direction to the other, I wonder what would happen if it throws up a small rock and it gets in between the treads [that's assuming it is used off road of course].  FL2 now gone and have a couple of items left for sale:-

Brodit active iPhone holder + Brodit dash clip,
Bluetooth Music Streaming Module.

In technical terms, though, is it still a 110? Is the wheelbase of a vehicle not the distance between the front-most and rear-most wheels?

Years ago, when I was looking for a safari vehicle, I nearly bought a 6x4 RR Classic. What put me off was the (to my eyes) botched rear end bodywork. It had twin side-hinged rear doors (like the old mini clubman estate) and just looked wrong - even if it did perhaps make for a more useful load access. What should have put me off was the extra weight, running costs, increased risk of punctures and sheer impracticality of the length of it!

EDIT: I stand corrected! Wikipedia suggests that the wheelbase of a tri-axle vehicle is measured from the centre of the steering axle to a point mid-way between the two rear axles. Which I am betting on this vehicle is longer than 110! 2005 D3 2.7 Auto
Previously:
2010 MY FL2 TD4e GS - Now gone at 199,500 miles, about 135,000 of them mine.
‘93 Defender 110 200TDi CSW
‘87 Defender 90 4 cyl Petrol
‘83 110 CSW V8 - best ever!
Range Rover 2-door V8 (not sure of year - 4-speed box and vacuum diff switch)
Series III SWB Diesel

Last edited by Worms on 19th Dec 2017 4:40 pm. Edited 1 time in total

The soft top bit is more about having free access for discharging firearms than lazy summer days.

Different people have been doing the six wheel versions over the years since the days of the Series II but very few indeed have managed to make the extra axle drive. Everyone can spread it - Anyone can catch it. Stay home - the life you save can be your own!

looks to me ..... KAHN are doing a mixed deal with NSC....... who did the RR.



only 67 seconds of your life wasted.

.

Had a look under the 6 wheeled Khan Defender at Billing a couple of years ago and it was indeed a 6x6. It had a stretched chassis and body including stretched front wings and bonnet. Whatever your thoughts on what Khan turn out in terms of style I was very very impressed with the quality of the workmanship. It had the straightest bodywork that I had ever seen on a Defender! It also had a stunning leather interior with what I thought was the highest attention to detail even although quilted seats are not my cup of tea!

LR NUT wrote:

A bit too bling bling for me

Ed, are you not into mother of pearl inlay walnut wood dash ???

Only place wood belongs is in the log burner or in a kitchen. I’ve got the extended grand black lacquer interior in mine consisting of the horrid plastic cold feeling aluminium surround and sat nav centre piece finished in piano black.
wink:

Before

Click image to enlarge

Click image to enlarge

Click image to enlarge

Click image to enlarge

Click image to enlarge

Click image to enlarge