Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > Off Topic > Attention all Oldies and Dashcammers |
|
|
dorsetfreelander Member Since: 20 Jul 2013 Location: Dorset Posts: 4354 |
I was once stopped late at night with kids in the back doing 43 in a 30 mph area on a new bit of road. I breathalysed OK then PC started to take down details,
|
||
20th Oct 2017 8:35 am |
|
Navigator Member Since: 29 Dec 2010 Location: Within reach of the coffee machine Posts: 492 |
In the early hours of the 1st January (in Scotland) I'm driving home along what had been a main A-class road before the motorway was opened when I spotted a police car down a side road. As expected, it followed me for a while until I was in the process of turning off when the blue lights went on. So I completed the turn and then pulled into my driveway.
|
||
20th Oct 2017 11:03 am |
|
Jimboland Member Since: 06 Dec 2015 Location: Northants Posts: 735 |
Yonks ago I lived in an area where there was a lot of development and building going on. The plans were for a dual carriageway but in the early stages of development only one side was built so it was and ordinary single carriageway with traffic in both directions. A year or so later the other side of the dual carriageway was built and opened and as I turned right on to the dual carriageway I was faced with a police car coming head on at me. Fortunately we were both able to stop - it was a tyre screeching smelly tyre smoke job. She, the WPC, got out of the car and started ranting and raving at me saving that I could have killed us both. She was going to book me for dangerous driving etc, etc., so I suggested that she should arrest me and take me to the police station pointing out that the best way to the police station was along the correct side of the dual carriageway. To say she was embarrased was quite an understatement, so much that she couldn't find time to apologise or give me her collar number or car reg number and mumbling something about clearing the road she got in her car and drove off in the right direction after making a real hash-up of turning round.
|
||
21st Oct 2017 9:59 am |
|
Bubbles Member Since: 07 Sep 2015 Location: Northants Posts: 70 |
Pretty sure that if the footage and raw file has been edited/tampered wit in any way it becomes inadmissible as evidence anyway - for a prosecution they would need to have the raw data on the memory card/chip - and it would have to be made available to any defence team if a prosecution was forthcoming. FL No 1 - 2012 (MY2011) XS manual Firenze Red - Gone FL No 2 - 2012 (MY2012) XS manual Barolo Black - SWMBO wanted one too! FL No 3 -2013 XS SD4 Auto Santorini Black Series III SWB Hardtop - long gone 110 CSW V8 - long gone Discovery 1 200Tdi - long gone |
||
25th Oct 2017 12:25 pm |
|
blacktiger Member Since: 31 Oct 2015 Location: St.Leonards on sea Posts: 564 |
But that would be when you're in a public place surrounded by, er, public. Not when alone in your car. MY13 Santorini Black SD4 HSE |
||
25th Oct 2017 4:46 pm |
|
Tradewind 35 Member Since: 04 Dec 2012 Location: Cornwall Posts: 441 |
Cops may look at dash cam footage to find out what happened or help identify suspects etc but the admissibility or not of dash cam footage in court is governed by the rules of evidence. So if another motorist were ever to be charged by the CPS on the basis of a case file prepared by the cops which included such footage, the defence would require full disclosure if there had been any redaction. Failure to provide the full unedited footage would most probably render it all inadmissible. |
||
25th Oct 2017 8:43 pm |
|
Navigator Member Since: 29 Dec 2010 Location: Within reach of the coffee machine Posts: 492 |
As the file does not show activity since the first moment of time, how technically is there any difference between a file from the camera that started on a certain day/time and a file that has been "shortened"? My Blackview in fact recordes a series of individual files of a user setable length, and auto deletes those without interesting content. So all I would need to do is keep the camera running until the earler files had gone and been overwritten by a view of my garage door. Everyone can spread it - Anyone can catch it. Stay home - the life you save can be your own! |
||
26th Oct 2017 9:12 am |
|
AW14 Member Since: 07 Mar 2014 Location: South East Posts: 142 |
My dash cams at are limited to 3min segments, no GPS and no speed shown. GPS is not really necessary and speed might be able to be calculated by the speed you pass fixed objects but I'm not worried about that. My road racy days are over but we can all accidently speed at times. It's too easy to creep up to 35+ on some 30mph roads especially as 20mph limits are popping up all over the place. |
||
26th Oct 2017 9:51 am |
|
dennij Member Since: 17 Oct 2016 Location: Up North Posts: 261 |
I suspect the issue of what was admissible would depend on how each party defended their actions citing who was right and who was wrong. If a vehicle pulled out in front of you from a side turning for example the amount of footage needed to prove this would be quite small as having 5 minutes of footage prior to the incident would have no bearing. However, if someone overtook you and swerved in front of you causing an accident, there may well be an argument that further footage would need to be made available to prove that you had not incited the action by a previous action you had taken on that journey.
|
||
26th Oct 2017 10:08 am |
|
Jimboland Member Since: 06 Dec 2015 Location: Northants Posts: 735 |
To update so far: Recieved a letter from the police RTC (Road Traffic Collision) Process Team to say that the report has now been recieved and giving a reference number. It goes on to say that before a final decision can be made further enquiries are necessary which may take up to six months after which I will be notified of the final decision.
|
||
27th Oct 2017 9:16 am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis