alex_pescaru
Member Since: 12 Mar 2009
Location: RO
Posts: 4642
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4400e/4400eeb2162b4d30a45e50b274ad219a20c804ba" alt=""
|
And that oil is JWS3309, not AW1.
Read the label carefully, don't be distracted by the name...
|
26th May 2016 6:01 pm |
|
alex_pescaru
Member Since: 12 Mar 2009
Location: RO
Posts: 4642
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4400e/4400eeb2162b4d30a45e50b274ad219a20c804ba" alt=""
|
It's too generic that one....
The AW1 spec. has a much lower viscosity than the JWS3309, in order to cope with the much intense performance vs. fuel efficiency compromise and usage in the new version of the box. Hence the frequent fluid changes.
It's hard to believe that they can manufacture an oil that it's good in almost all applications, like that long list says...
Better look for a more narrow AW1 (I believe JWS3324) specification.
Don't get me wrong, but it's amazing how people are looking for cheaper and cheaper alternatives for servicing items of thousands of pounds... Even if you buy LR, the cost wont be much bigger than a tank or two of fuel, considering that you can't drop more than 3 liters per change... And how many tanks of fuel you pay between autobox oil changes? What's one or two more compared with the peace of mind that you put the right fluid?
But then again, it's your decision and please don't take personally the above.
|
26th May 2016 9:53 pm |
|