Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > General > Who should repair my car? |
|
|
seriesonenut Member Since: 04 Aug 2014 Location: Essex Posts: 62 |
Hi
|
||
18th Sep 2016 5:35 pm |
|
seriesonenut Member Since: 04 Aug 2014 Location: Essex Posts: 62 |
Yes I can see how that worked for you. Ill speak to my insurer in the morning and see what they advise. I don't want to walk away from them and put myself in the hands of an insurer I know nothing about (except the name). |
||
18th Sep 2016 6:44 pm |
|
yorkshirepudding Member Since: 20 Feb 2016 Location: Yorkshire Posts: 63 |
As far as I am aware you can take the car to any repairer of your choice (assuming of course the repair costs are reasonable).
|
||
18th Sep 2016 6:54 pm |
|
seriesonenut Member Since: 04 Aug 2014 Location: Essex Posts: 62 |
Yes I see I am not probably obligated to go via my insurer, but it seems odd the insurer of the car that hit me is trying to get me to go to them direct and cut out my own insurer. Why? |
||
18th Sep 2016 7:00 pm |
|
Purplemadboy Member Since: 22 Jul 2014 Location: Scotland Posts: 1079 |
Some insurance companies have their own workshops, I think direct line is one of them .. if you took the car to LR their guys will be on a higher hourly rate than the guys at direct line thus LR will be more expensive. Do it now ! Your a long time dead !! |
||
18th Sep 2016 7:16 pm |
|
yorkshirepudding Member Since: 20 Feb 2016 Location: Yorkshire Posts: 63 |
Purely costs I should imagine, there has been a lot in the press around insurance companies making money by inflating costs of repairs and courtesy cars etc. Your insurer will probably bill the third parties insurance at retail rates for the repairs and courtesy car, whereas their in house/preferred repairers probably cost/bill them a lot less. |
||
18th Sep 2016 7:28 pm |
|
yorkshirepudding Member Since: 20 Feb 2016 Location: Yorkshire Posts: 63 |
Following on from my first reply to highlight this, the third party who crashed into me was a young girl and initially wanted not to go through the insurers, I didn't mind either way.
|
||
18th Sep 2016 7:38 pm |
|
seriesonenut Member Since: 04 Aug 2014 Location: Essex Posts: 62 |
Thanks, it makes sense. I seem to be in a position of being told to do one thing by my insurer and the opposite by the third party insurer! |
||
18th Sep 2016 7:43 pm |
|
ricky64 Member Since: 29 Mar 2015 Location: wolverhampton Posts: 141 |
This is quite common now with the big insurance companies, They know that when their client is clearly at fault all your insurance company will do is inflate the claim with management costs etc. Advantages to you are its generally quicker to get your car repaired,you wont have to cough up excess and claim back and it shouldn't affect your no claims as you havnt had to make a claim via your policy. i know many will say well you can get your no claims back if its not your fault but its not always that easy. i have a no fault claim going through now and because my insurance is up before the claim is settled i have lost my no claims and my premium has gone through roof.i should get it back but its all hassle
|
||
18th Sep 2016 10:32 pm |
|
colinrr Member Since: 08 Feb 2011 Location: North Gloucestershire Posts: 104 |
My daughter had her car repaired by the third party's insurance company (Sainsbury). She checked first with her own insurer who agreed. The other driver was at fault. The service she received was excellent - car collected from her house, hire car left and, after the repair her own car dropped off. I was there to check the repair and it looked excellent with a full valet thrown in. 1982 RR Classic-converted to 200TDi-gone
|
||
19th Sep 2016 11:39 am |
|
andy3681 Member Since: 03 Jan 2015 Location: Newcastle under Lyme/Le Dorat Haute Vienne Posts: 71 |
I think insurance companies do it now to save time and costs. I was rear ended then had a call from the other drivers insurance (churchil) within a couple of hours offering a hire car and to take mine away. I insisted it went to a bodyshop I knew who then made a mess of it so next time they can just take it away.
|
||
19th Sep 2016 2:10 pm |
|
exbrat202 Member Since: 05 May 2011 Location: Wootton Bassett Posts: 97 |
I chose to have mine repaired by the LR dealer approved repairer which gave it a LR approved guarantee certificate.
|
||
19th Sep 2016 4:02 pm |
|
seriesonenut Member Since: 04 Aug 2014 Location: Essex Posts: 62 |
Thanks for the replies. I have decided to go with the offer from the 3rd parties insurer (Privilege). Within an hour the hire company confirmed I had a car reserved and the garage called to arrange for collection when I get home from holiday. My own insurers said it was up to me (after warning me I have no contract with the 3rd parties insurer) and have recorded it as notification only.
|
||
19th Sep 2016 5:47 pm |
|
Past master Member Since: 30 Jun 2010 Location: Isle of Ely Posts: 2710 |
My wife is on my policy ("just in case" as she refuses to drive it!) and recently had a no-fault claim on her own insurance, This has upped my insurance by £21.06. One reason why I decided not to make a claim recently when a Sainsbury's car park bollard leapt out at me and destroyed a door. Although I have a guaranteed no claims bonus, it would have upped my premiums in future as well as upping the premiums on the other cars I drive. Taking into account also my policy excess I reckon I have at least broken even by spending £450.00 instead of the £1800.00 bodyshop quote, and don't have a mark against me when it comes to renewal.
|
||
19th Sep 2016 5:58 pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis