Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > Off Topic > PC Ram confused |
|
|
pcheaven Member Since: 19 Jan 2010 Location: Kent Posts: 1459 |
adding more RAM wont change the CPU clock speed from 1.8 to 3.6.
|
||
11th Dec 2014 2:17 pm |
|
pcheaven Member Since: 19 Jan 2010 Location: Kent Posts: 1459 |
so, I guess the questions are
|
||
11th Dec 2014 2:21 pm |
|
npinks Member Since: 28 Jun 2007 Location: Ls25 Posts: 20090 |
Win XP home edition 2003 SP3
|
||
11th Dec 2014 2:24 pm |
|
pcheaven Member Since: 19 Jan 2010 Location: Kent Posts: 1459 |
yep, most probably 32 bit, so 3.5 is probably the best you will ever see in windows
|
||
11th Dec 2014 2:29 pm |
|
taztastic Member Since: 03 Feb 2011 Location: North West Posts: 8652 |
Is that the Yorkshireman in you, keep it going for as long as possible. Joking aside, Windows 8 is very very good, persevere with it as at first it will infuriate you, get over the first few days and habits of XP and you will love it. As for the SSD, yes get one, they are unbelievably quick compared to a HDD. |
||
11th Dec 2014 2:34 pm |
|
npinks Member Since: 28 Jun 2007 Location: Ls25 Posts: 20090 |
don't see the point in upgrading OS each year at the office, upgrade too quickly the systems we run haven't kept up and causes issues
|
||
11th Dec 2014 3:29 pm |
|
taztastic Member Since: 03 Feb 2011 Location: North West Posts: 8652 |
There is that, if it aint broke, Win XP is no longer supported though and you need to be careful that any software that you are running, if that is upgraded then you may be left with a right mess as there will be no upgraded drivers from Microsoft. This will happen at the most inopportune moment so keep an upgrade in mind for a quiet day |
||
11th Dec 2014 3:35 pm |
|
npinks Member Since: 28 Jun 2007 Location: Ls25 Posts: 20090 |
new software we are installing (hence my ram issue) word with XP till they stopped supporting it, still does, but might upgrade to Win7/8 if needs be Former Mod/Member, with the most post & Chicken George Arch nemesis |
||
11th Dec 2014 3:49 pm |
|
npinks Member Since: 28 Jun 2007 Location: Ls25 Posts: 20090 |
the newer DELL PC with Win7 on according to the crucial scanner could have upto 16GB of ram, had 2gb so thought I would add another 2GB to make 4gb, beep at start up and informed me of a memory change had been detected, went to config, showed 4gb been installed and exited, loaded up and show 3.21gb accessible
|
||
11th Dec 2014 4:12 pm |
|
taztastic Member Since: 03 Feb 2011 Location: North West Posts: 8652 |
Yes, that will be correct, the video system can also use the memory too and this will also give rise to it reporting less than installed. |
||
11th Dec 2014 4:43 pm |
|
dorsetfreelander Member Since: 20 Jul 2013 Location: Dorset Posts: 4354 |
I started in the Computer industry in 1973 and remember a course about a new mainframe (cost millions of £s) and the phrase "it's got 32 bit addressing so will be able to address about 4 Gbytes which is more than anyone will ever need" Wow.
|
||
12th Dec 2014 12:33 am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis