Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > General > Manual or Auto, An Agest Poll! |
|
|
|
ccsnet Member Since: 05 Jan 2013 Location: Lancs Posts: 881 |
T PS I'm under 50 but would prefer an auto when I get older so thats how I voted.... basically when I CBA Terran 'The' Car For The Modern Day UK Roads ( ie all the pot holes ) 'A Freelander that leaks oil is just marking its territory' - Wise words Now a member of the FL2 'Silly Bill' Club |
||
28th May 2013 10:10 pm |
|
Slaneydore Member Since: 23 Mar 2013 Location: Broxbourne Hertfordshire Posts: 1603 |
Auto under 50 but only by 5 years
|
||
29th May 2013 5:58 am |
|
ad210358 Member Since: 12 Oct 2008 Location: Here and There Posts: 7464 |
The Doctor hasn't commented yet, must be undecided p****d off with a Digital Keyboard Warrior |
||
29th May 2013 6:50 am |
|
SYFL2 Member Since: 16 Jun 2012 Location: Sheffield Posts: 2594 |
Or working out his age |
||
29th May 2013 6:56 am |
|
fredastaire Member Since: 03 Dec 2012 Location: Holbrook Posts: 721 |
An odd question as it just takes a snapshot in time; i'm in the over 50 bracket but have had Autos for over thirty years, my son has an auto. I bought a manual 2 years previous to the FL and realised what a terrible mistake it was so i'm back on autos.
|
||
29th May 2013 8:02 am |
|
pab Member Since: 28 Aug 2012 Location: Now in Mid-Wales Posts: 2007 |
The problem on here is that it's generally the auto drivers with the attitude! I'm not only firmly in the make-up-your-own-mind camp, I make up my own mind differently depending on my lifestyle current at the time. Now I don't do so much city driving I own and prefer a manual (so that's how I voted). But when I used to commute into the city every day we owned one of each, and then I'd use the auto much (but still not all) of the time. So I prefer a manual in principle, I have plenty of experience of autos, and I don't slate either. I just get annoyed when others (of either camp) try to force their 'my view is best' attitude on us all. I guess you either 'get' the manual thing, or you don't. If you don't, then enjoy your auto - I used to enjoy ours when we had it, but I don't miss it! |
||
29th May 2013 8:33 am |
|
chrisr1806 Member Since: 20 Oct 2012 Location: None Posts: 2220 |
I like manual sportier cars, but on the FL2 I found the manual took a lot of effort. This is my first auto and I would have another. |
||
29th May 2013 9:39 am |
|
j77 Member Since: 26 Nov 2008 Location: Fife Posts: 2909 |
I've owned both auto and manual Fl2s, I don't have preference as such each of the cars are excellent to drive.
|
||
29th May 2013 9:55 am |
|
Jimski Member Since: 21 Jan 2013 Location: Staffordshire Posts: 649 |
I'm 25 with a manual black edition.....would have auto tomorrow if given the choice. Defo having auto next time!! 2013 FL2 - Black Edition Auto
|
||
29th May 2013 10:30 am |
|
WizzardPrang Member Since: 19 Oct 2012 Location: Hertfordshire Posts: 93 |
I'm over 50 and have never owned a car with an auto box, although I've driven several belonging to my father-in-law who was obviously a lot older than me. I've always enjoyed the sense of control.
|
||
29th May 2013 10:47 am |
|
pab Member Since: 28 Aug 2012 Location: Now in Mid-Wales Posts: 2007 |
For towing, perhaps. But for off-roading, given the choice, I'd still go for a manual with low range and locking or limited slip diffs. That's effectively what I had 20 years ago on the Isuzu, and despite its age that car would still give the FL2 a very good run for its money off road! It also had a manual fast idle control - something which one doesn't seem to come across these days - which meant that for rock crawls or descents one could simply set a speed with the idle control then take the feet off everything and let the car get on with it. Like that it was almost unstoppable, and certainly less hard work than an FL2 would be, auto or manual. The Forester, too, had low range and limited slip diffs, but it wasn't the same. The low range wasn't anywhere near low enough to control a descent, which rather takes away the point of low range, although it was ideal for low-speed manoeuvring. Cars like the FL2 do a lot with electronics, but there's a lot to be said for getting the basic 4wd system right, then most of the electronics are simply unnecessary. (The obvious example of which is Defender.) |
||
29th May 2013 11:04 am |
|
Natwest Member Since: 06 Oct 2008 Location: North Cotswolds Posts: 576 |
under 50, with slight bias to auto (laziness) but it depends on the auto in question. F-Type auto very nice, Evoque flappy paddles very nice. Dislike old floor mounted stick. |
||
29th May 2013 11:08 am |
|
EYorkshire Member Since: 18 Nov 2010 Location: (!) Posts: 4392 |
The problem on here is that it's generally the manual drivers with the attitude!
|
||
29th May 2013 11:18 am |
|
Boycey Member Since: 10 Mar 2013 Location: Midlands Posts: 97 |
What if you're 50? |
||
29th May 2013 11:32 am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis