Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > General > Freelander - LR2 why the name change for the States? |
|
|
Andy131 Member Since: 09 Dec 2009 Location: Manchester Posts: 2182 |
Possibly because the FL1 had such bad reliability record it was felt that a clean break would be best for new sales.
|
||
27th Dec 2012 11:24 am |
|
jutrem Member Since: 14 Mar 2008 Location: Burlington Posts: 144 |
... Land Rover were also playing with the idea of using Alpha-Numeric naming for their vehicles like their competitors (eg. X3, X5, IS, ES, GLK, M Class). Since the average north American customer had no real knowledge of the traditional Land Rover product line. Land Rover (Officially) returned to Canada in 1994, late 80's (Range Rovers only) for the US after been out of the market since the early 70's, It was easier to use US & Canada as a test area for the new naming convention. They faced more opposition in their more mature markets where the names (Freelander, and Discovery) where liked and had better reputations. When you enter a large new market around the same time has Kia, its harder to build a serious base with funny sounding model names.
|
||
30th Dec 2012 6:26 pm |
|
Pedro Member Since: 01 Apr 2010 Location: Very near Pig Hill Posts: 449 |
Unfortunately, my wife's FL1 (2006) is proving significantly more reliable than my FL2 (2010) and it has done twice the mileage too ........... FL2 HSE Auto Galway Green
|
||
30th Dec 2012 7:22 pm |
|
Mona Geeza Member Since: 22 May 2010 Location: Devon Posts: 1293 |
Because probably in America they would be getting their lawyers putting a claim in to Land Rover because they read they were getting a "Free" Lander and then were asked to pay for it.
|
||
30th Dec 2012 8:51 pm |
|
mikehzz Member Since: 04 Sep 2009 Location: Springwood Posts: 749 |
I wish they had used LR2 in Australia as well. The Freelander has a very poor reputation here and most people don't even recognise there are 2 models. If you mention them on forums you get warned not to touch them due to unreliability and expensive repairs. It's worse in the US because they mainly had the petrol models which were way worse than the td4's. Sales would be a lot higher here if they had gone with LR2 in my opinion. |
||
30th Dec 2012 10:24 pm |
|
Andy131 Member Since: 09 Dec 2009 Location: Manchester Posts: 2182 |
Got to agree our 2006 FL1 never failed to get us home, even from the Sahara, yes it had a couple of sensor failures, but continued to operate. Our FL2 has twice been on the back of a lowloader, granted in 86,000 sometimes very hard miles. Tangiers Orange - gone, missing her Replaced by Ewok what a mistake - now a happy Disco Sport owner |
||
31st Dec 2012 1:27 am |
|
jules Member Since: 13 Dec 2007 Location: The Wilds of Warwickshire Posts: 4987 |
And like the person who turned on the cruise control in their Winnebago and then got out of the drivers seat to make a brew with obvious consequences. At court it was determined that it was the manufacturers fault for not explaining that its not the same as an auto-pilot and doesnt follow the sat-nav. |
||
31st Dec 2012 4:44 pm |
|
richardk Member Since: 11 Jan 2009 Location: Norwich Posts: 909 |
I think the disco was LR3 first in USA wasn't it? Would the disco have confused with a space shuttle or something? |
||
31st Dec 2012 5:00 pm |
|
taztastic Member Since: 03 Feb 2011 Location: North West Posts: 8652 |
Anything confuses the Americans, unfortunately pictures don't quite work as a name for a car
|
||
31st Dec 2012 5:04 pm |
|
Mav71 Member Since: 15 Nov 2008 Location: Leicester Posts: 2575 |
The real reason had nothing to do with numerical names like the competition, it was to remove the association with the original Discovery and Freelander problematic Lucas electrics, which all but ruined the LR name in America.
|
||
2nd Jan 2013 9:06 am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis