Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > General > Tata acquiring? |
|
|
upnaway Member Since: 15 Nov 2007 Location: Worcestershire Posts: 258 |
F/L2s Diesel engine is a Peugeot unit and the Petrol a Volvo and I suppose business is business, nobody will wish to stop selling and loose the profit. As I've noted before Land Rover have had a history of buying engines from others ie BMW, VM and on a wider front I dont suppose Ford will wish to stop supplying into Disco3, RRS & RR, after all their long term plans did not include Ford USA selling their customer. still pining for my 3dr, no removeable hardtop, no drop glass tailgate, no roof rack, no pockets everywhere to stow all that man kit |
||
31st Jan 2008 8:41 pm |
|
Lr2maker Member Since: 18 Oct 2007 Location: Uk Posts: 138 |
Yep tata close to take over. Ford will supply engines for lr2. Probably not for lr3 though. Lr2 got seven years left before replacement. Don't worry too much Live your life be free-lander |
||
2nd Feb 2008 11:24 am |
|
jules1967 Member Since: 02 Feb 2008 Location: Leeds Posts: 170 |
I am Horrified at the thought.
|
||
2nd Feb 2008 3:27 pm |
|
npinks Member Since: 28 Jun 2007 Location: Ls25 Posts: 20090 |
Everybody can have there worries about the TATA takeover
|
||
2nd Feb 2008 4:48 pm |
|
Dave Member Since: 04 Jul 2007 Location: Somewhere Near You Posts: 2666 |
According to Land Rover Monthly magazine, Ford has announced that TATA is now the only bidder for Jaguar and Land Rover and it seems that the terms will include a 5 year period during which TATA cannot close any of the Jaguar or Land Rover plants, safeguarding jobs at Halewood and Solihull in the mid-term.
|
||
2nd Feb 2008 4:59 pm |
|
Nick Jan Member Since: 23 Aug 2007 Location: Nr Shoreham-by-sea, West Sussex Posts: 441 |
I broadly agree with Npinks. It's too easy to rubbish Tata. Much of our experience of them is based on outsourcing IT work from the UK to India in the hope of reduced expenditure. In many cases this was not fully realised, or the end result not as intended, due to our failure to work collaboratively across continents. Dare I say that this was sometimes caused by disgruntled or ineffective UK project leaders, worried about their own jobs!
|
||
2nd Feb 2008 5:39 pm |
|
upnaway Member Since: 15 Nov 2007 Location: Worcestershire Posts: 258 |
Just had a looked at Fords full year results and exec statements. Looks like L/R/Jag made $500million profit and Jag just launching a highly acclaimed new product which must have cost zillions to develop. To sell all of that for $2bn much speak a barrow load for Fords overall position. Looks like Tata are getting a bargain to me, pity nobody in the UK saw the opportunity. still pining for my 3dr, no removeable hardtop, no drop glass tailgate, no roof rack, no pockets everywhere to stow all that man kit |
||
2nd Feb 2008 6:58 pm |
|
jules1967 Member Since: 02 Feb 2008 Location: Leeds Posts: 170 |
There are a whole lot of reasons why IT offshoring is normally a disaster, I could easily write a paper on it. Most of it though comes down to cultural differences and the fact that an Indian programmer is just that, a programmer. He is not expected to think or question but to work strictly to spec. A European programmer is actually an analyst programmer - a completely different animal who will question and re-interpret. As management don't understand the difference they see the 2 as the same. So the west sends beermat type specs overseas, and gets a beermat product back (normally late and not working properly). Not entirely surprising. Plus they have no one to 'apprentice train' them, so rookies teach rookies and bad working practices follow. Anyway - I do think the takeover will be disasterous but I also strongly hope that, in a few years time, I can come on here and admit I was wrong. 07 Freelander 2 TD4SE Tambora Flame, side steps, privacy glass, mud flaps, boot liner and a tow bar. Ok it's the Wifes but she lets me drive it occasionally - if I've been good! |
||
3rd Feb 2008 11:55 am |
|
vafree2 Member Since: 28 Nov 2007 Location: Nic Posts: 34 |
"terms will include a 5 year period during which TATA cannot close any of the Jaguar or Land Rover plan"
|
||
3rd Feb 2008 7:00 pm |
|
paulwlee Member Since: 05 Sep 2007 Location: California, USA Posts: 7 |
With the big quality problems in North America scaring away customers (lots of people like LRs, but you all know that there are lots of people who are reluctant to try them out due to the bad reputation) if there is any big change after the takeover, I bet that they beef up QA. These people are businessmen, and driving the company into the ground for no reason is not good business. |
||
4th Feb 2008 4:59 am |
|
yamaha-fan Member Since: 11 Jun 2007 Location: Munich Posts: 324 |
Interesting discussion. But why so negative?
|
||
4th Feb 2008 6:01 am |
|
commando Member Since: 27 Apr 2007 Location: lancashire Posts: 208 |
When the choice of new cars is so fantastic and it is very hard to decide which car to buy I would be inclined not to buy a Land Rover in the future if it was owned by TATA.As usual Ford are making the wrong decision by losing a money making brand just to offload Jaguar.The new xf is car of the year and looks to be a success so why sell now?Make the right cars and they will sell-look at Land Rover pre Discovery compared to now! Stornaway grey SE auto with 18" alloys |
||
5th Feb 2008 3:29 pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis