Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > Off Topic > Car 'Anti Modification' Legislation Consultation |
|
|
IanMetro Member Since: 11 Sep 2017 Location: Somerset BS21 Posts: 3133 |
This dropped into my newsfeed today.
|
||
11th Nov 2021 9:13 am |
|
Lightwater Member Since: 21 Aug 2014 Location: Sydney Northern Beaches Posts: 4906 |
Will be interesting what they call a modification, i.e. hard wiring a dashcam? Additional acoustic insulation? Chucking out the can of tyre spray & fitting a full size spare? Procrastination, mankind's greatest labour saving device!
|
||
11th Nov 2021 10:39 am |
|
Jack frost Member Since: 21 Dec 2011 Location: UK Posts: 796 |
The good old days of enjoying motoring are now long gone |
||
11th Nov 2021 11:14 am |
|
Grimdog Member Since: 08 Sep 2020 Location: Wakefield Posts: 314 |
It's been like that in other (EU) countries for years. I can only quite in France, but for example, years ago my Suzuki samurai was failed at CT ( MOT ) time because the back seats had been removed, so the vehicle was not as it left the factory. Not withstanding that the seats were ment to be removed with 4 wingnuts. The seatbelts were still in place and worked. You don't see any (legal ) modified bikes either, although there is no MOT requirement for them at the moment ( although this is being debated at present )! |
||
11th Nov 2021 11:43 am |
|
Dave47 Member Since: 31 Aug 2014 Location: Margate Kent Posts: 1333 |
It looks like it will be mainly looking at future vehicles and how
|
||
11th Nov 2021 11:56 am |
|
IanMetro Member Since: 11 Sep 2017 Location: Somerset BS21 Posts: 3133 |
I think the answer should lie in the direction of making the log book/record more complete.
|
||
11th Nov 2021 12:32 pm |
|
Andy131 Member Since: 09 Dec 2009 Location: Manchester Posts: 2184 |
The problem isn't always the law, it's the enforcers interpretation of the law.
|
||
11th Nov 2021 4:58 pm |
|
dorsetfreelander Member Since: 20 Jul 2013 Location: Dorset Posts: 4354 |
A friend of mine has a Jaguar XF and wanted (for some reason) to have his calipers removed and painted red. He mentioned it to the insurance company and they increased his premium. 3 x FL1 2 manual + 1 auto
|
||
15th Nov 2021 6:34 pm |
|
Andy131 Member Since: 09 Dec 2009 Location: Manchester Posts: 2184 |
looks nicer than standard = looks nicer to thieves = more likely to be stolen = increased premium
|
||
15th Nov 2021 6:49 pm |
|
Jimboland Member Since: 06 Dec 2015 Location: Northants Posts: 734 |
I bought the car new from a main stealer and had side steps fitted. Looking around for insurance, one company asked if the car was exactly as it left the factory. It had genuine Land Rover side steps fitted at the dealer as part of the order for the car. The insurance company decided that genuine Land Rover accessories fitted by Land Rover trained mechanics at a Land Rover main stealer meant that the car was non-standard and quoted about £1,500. Unsurprisingly I stuck with LV at about £200.
|
||
16th Nov 2021 11:00 am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis