Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > General > Manual or Automatic? |
|
|
deluser_qhf Member Since: 15 Feb 2009 Location: Removed Posts: 95 |
As per title!! which do you prefer and why! im not sure which one to go for. |
||
8th Apr 2009 9:01 pm |
|
Lukey Luke Member Since: 09 Nov 2008 Location: Celles Posts: 82 |
As said above, each to their own.
|
||
9th Apr 2009 8:06 am |
|
zone30 Member Since: 20 Jan 2009 Location: OVL Posts: 683 |
If you're planning to go really offroad with the thing, go for automatic. The performance is even more impressive then. Had a demonstration before I bought one and the guy stopped halfway a steep hill and continued without ever sliding back. Doing that with a manual may burn the clutch.
|
||
9th Apr 2009 8:42 am |
|
chicken george Member Since: 05 Dec 2007 Location: N. Yorks Posts: 13289 |
At work At home "I can't always believe facts I read on the web" - Charles Dickens winner by default of the tractor vs caravan race |
||
9th Apr 2009 8:58 am |
|
zone30 Member Since: 20 Jan 2009 Location: OVL Posts: 683 |
|
||
9th Apr 2009 9:29 am |
|
MVS Member Since: 06 Nov 2008 Location: Back under my favourite rock Posts: 267 |
No decision for us really, let the gearbox do the work, and easier to sell/trade on. EDITED to add ' in higher spec's it's almost expected to be an auto'
|
||
9th Apr 2009 10:18 am |
|
deluser_qhf Member Since: 15 Feb 2009 Location: Removed Posts: 95 |
cheers guys!! I've test driven both and found the auto to be a bit sluggish but is that just because i'm not used to it? |
||
9th Apr 2009 10:24 am |
|
MVS Member Since: 06 Nov 2008 Location: Back under my favourite rock Posts: 267 |
Yes you could say an auto is more sluggish, it's designed for a more relaxed type of driving. They are also slightly less efficient generally so aren't as nippy (VAG DSG being an exception).
|
||
9th Apr 2009 10:28 am |
|
npinks Member Since: 28 Jun 2007 Location: Ls25 Posts: 20090 |
I would have got a auto, if it was available when i bought as it better for towing and the occasional off road trip
|
||
9th Apr 2009 10:55 am |
|
jbvox Member Since: 27 Oct 2008 Location: W Vl Posts: 57 |
for the last 5 cars I owned when deciding to change to a new one I said it would be an auto, but each time I spend the surplus money for an auto on a more visual option. And each time I say to myself, my next car will be an auto (especcially when in a traffic jam). It is a more relaxed driving with the auto, but I must say that the manual in the FL2 is also great (due to the 400nm torque?) Fl2 zermattsilver TD4 S man |
||
9th Apr 2009 11:38 am |
|
RJ Member Since: 28 Mar 2009 Location: The power station Posts: 10 |
One week into my auto....no arguement the auto is the one to go for, superb engine/gearbox marriage makes life driving on todays roads sooo much easier...don't think the difference between manual and auto is a decision maker, my auto is plenty fast enough...provided you press the pedal..as for economy I am still playing with it but last tank average between fills was 31.7mpg which I reckon ain't bad given the type of motor it is....well pleased 09MY TD4 HST Auto Stornoway Napoli in Ebony Black Side Tubes + Side Protection Strips |
||
9th Apr 2009 11:44 am |
|
AndyC Member Since: 30 Nov 2007 Location: Where the snow dosen't melt when the sun is shining! Posts: 4165 |
Automatic Positive: The best for real off-roading (as I found out on my LRE). More relaxing to drive.
|
||
9th Apr 2009 4:46 pm |
|
Chris B Member Since: 23 Jul 2008 Location: North Yorkshire Posts: 440 |
Last post just about sums it up: Manual for economy, Auto for city drivers and maximum off-road capability.
|
||
9th Apr 2009 6:32 pm |
|
carlfraz Member Since: 10 Apr 2007 Location: Minkies lap dancing club Posts: 839 |
Had both, manual first, then auto. My choice....Auto all the way
|
||
9th Apr 2009 8:21 pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis