Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > Off Topic > Chernobyl |
|
|
blueboy Member Since: 20 Aug 2017 Location: Bedfordshire Posts: 202 |
I watched it some time ago, wow the effects of the radiation on those poor firemen who had no idea what they were dealing with.
|
||
29th Sep 2019 7:55 am |
|
Dartman the one Member Since: 04 Apr 2013 Location: Seville, Spain Posts: 1687 |
The results are known, though Chernobyl was in the Soviet Union as was Ukraine it isn't now and there is free entry for anyone to the area with permissions, it's even a tourist trail with limited access time due to the ongoing radiation. the programme has some inaccuracies and obvious drama, yes many were killed and the danger to personnel not given at the time, however there was no threat to the world any more than the Japanese plant was, the explosion was due to loss of cooling flow giving off super heated steam which blew apart the reactor and the reaction stopped however the cloud of steam rising in the atmosphere then irradiated the local countryside and was carried across to the west gradually degrading.
|
||
29th Sep 2019 9:25 am |
|
jules Member Since: 13 Dec 2007 Location: The Wilds of Warwickshire Posts: 5010 |
From the program it seems that the initial explosion was one thing but the sand/boron dropped by helicopter to put out the fire had the effect of sealing in the heat generated by the molten core. The scientists calculated that the core would melt through the concrete base and into tanks, which should have been empty but now were full of water from the attempts to dowse the fire, within 72 hours. The resulting explosion (2-4 Mega tonnes) would take out the 3 remaining nuclear reactors and eject their cores into a shock wave spreading out over a 200km radius - likely to be fatal to everyone within that distance including the entire populations of Kiev and Minsk. Belarus and Ukraine would not be habitable for over a 100 years. All the countries to Germany would be severely affected.
|
||
29th Sep 2019 5:08 pm |
|
dorsetfreelander Member Since: 20 Jul 2013 Location: Dorset Posts: 4354 |
I suspect that the documentary was a bit exaggerated as ever. I was working with the UK atomic energy authority when this happened and there was no sign of panic and everyone was fairly laid back about it. They were more concerned with radiation leakage from Sellafield at the time and the radiation from Chernobyl was less of a problem. We did have a reactor with a somewhat similar design (since decommissioned) but it didn't have a positive void coefficient so that was ok. π 3 x FL1 2 manual + 1 auto
|
||
29th Sep 2019 5:13 pm |
|
Dartman the one Member Since: 04 Apr 2013 Location: Seville, Spain Posts: 1687 |
2 to 4 mega tons explosion is in the nuclear fusion range not fission range, accidents from nuclear fission cannot result in a fusion range explosion. my PC is slightly to the right of Genghis
|
||
29th Sep 2019 5:22 pm |
|
jules Member Since: 13 Dec 2007 Location: The Wilds of Warwickshire Posts: 5010 |
Yes you are correct. The largest fission bombs were in the kiloton range.
|
||
29th Sep 2019 5:44 pm |
|
jules Member Since: 13 Dec 2007 Location: The Wilds of Warwickshire Posts: 5010 |
Was that the Thorpe reactor ? IIRC There was one that caught fire and the country was saved from significant radioactive contamination because a scientist insisted on filters being added on the chimneys which stopped the radioactive dust escaping. Jules |
||
29th Sep 2019 5:50 pm |
|
jules Member Since: 13 Dec 2007 Location: The Wilds of Warwickshire Posts: 5010 |
lots of info here
|
||
29th Sep 2019 6:34 pm |
|
Boxbrownie Member Since: 17 Mar 2019 Location: Looe Posts: 2053 |
And this is why we are buying the Chinese technology (and manpower mostly) for our new NPs.
|
||
29th Sep 2019 6:48 pm |
|
dorsetfreelander Member Since: 20 Jul 2013 Location: Dorset Posts: 4354 |
No SGHW or steam generating heavy water reactor at UKAEA Winfrith in Dorset. Apparently this was the nearest thing to the Chernobyl design but with a number of differences which made it more stable. It produced about 100 MW of power into the grid for some years and was switched off in the 90's. I worked for ICL the computer company and was based there for a few years and was responsible for sales and support of our systems across the nuclear industry. Incidentally Thorpe is not a reactor but stands for thermal oxide reprocessing plant 3 x FL1 2 manual + 1 auto 5 x FL2 4 manual + 1 auto Now Discovery Sport P250 MHEV SE |
||
30th Sep 2019 7:05 am |
|
Dartman the one Member Since: 04 Apr 2013 Location: Seville, Spain Posts: 1687 |
I thought the new Nuclear power stations were French technology and Chinese cash, not sure what went wrong with AGR reactors which were to be the future before the last Labour government decided nuclear wasn't the way to go, had it decided it was the way to go we would now have them working and a lot cheaper my PC is slightly to the right of Genghis
|
||
30th Sep 2019 11:31 am |
|
Boxbrownie Member Since: 17 Mar 2019 Location: Looe Posts: 2053 |
We should have gone with the Finnish design but it was too expensive, went for the Chinese design.......SWMBO had the reports written for them.
|
||
30th Sep 2019 12:40 pm |
|
jules Member Since: 13 Dec 2007 Location: The Wilds of Warwickshire Posts: 5010 |
My bad, it was the Windscale Pile 1 reactor which caught fire https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windscale_fire Fascinating stuff - inc government cover up, scientists' safety fears being ignored, heroic actions going unrecognised Jules |
||
30th Sep 2019 3:17 pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis