Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > Maintenance & Modifications > Tuning Box - Better than remap? |
|
|
pmcg Member Since: 29 Mar 2007 Location: Lytham St Annes Posts: 59 |
I noticed someone selling a second hand tuning box on ebay. They gave it rave reviews.
|
||
16th Feb 2008 11:00 am |
|
pmcg Member Since: 29 Mar 2007 Location: Lytham St Annes Posts: 59 |
I have heard similar problems with Tuneit.
|
||
17th Feb 2008 9:52 am |
|
Mav71 Member Since: 15 Nov 2008 Location: Leicester Posts: 2575 |
There are big differences.
|
||
15th Nov 2008 9:40 pm |
|
chicken george Member Since: 05 Dec 2007 Location: N. Yorks Posts: 13291 |
dont forget our site sponsor 'bells' At work
|
||
15th Nov 2008 9:57 pm |
|
MVS Member Since: 06 Nov 2008 Location: Back under my favourite rock Posts: 267 |
Most, but not all in-line tuning boxes are an elaborate box with a 2p resistor inside that fools the ECU into over-fueling to increase power, which the Lambda sensor then corrects for. They increase power and generally fuel consumption also.
|
||
15th Nov 2008 10:34 pm |
|
Mav71 Member Since: 15 Nov 2008 Location: Leicester Posts: 2575 |
Thats not so true these days, if you abuse it then yes your correct, but most management systems and mechanics can handle more than standard power/torque as the durability testing of these powertrains are very high. I do 30/35000 miles a year in my work car, now being a Signum 1.9 CDTi 150, although this one is not mapped, my last Astra/Signum and Vectra's were all mapped and never had one issue. But again, treat them with respect and they will give no problems. Regarding re-maps, if your thinking of re-mapping your FL2, the only company I would consider using is Superchips. They actually own an FL2 and spent months on development. Freelander 2 HSE Lux 2013MY - Barolo Black with Ivory Leather. Alpine DVD - Privacy -Evoque 20" Dynamic Wheels and more to come......... |
||
2nd Jan 2009 9:06 am |
|
MVS Member Since: 06 Nov 2008 Location: Back under my favourite rock Posts: 267 |
Considering the 'minimum' quality of the oil the main dealers use (see 2 stroke thread & others) I would still change the oil more frequently if I were to use a power upgrade as I have on previous cars. If not I would use a better spec oil on the factory schedule as much for peace of mind as anything else.
|
||
2nd Jan 2009 9:33 am |
|
Mav71 Member Since: 15 Nov 2008 Location: Leicester Posts: 2575 |
Thats a fair point Freelander 2 HSE Lux 2013MY - Barolo Black with Ivory Leather. Alpine DVD - Privacy -Evoque 20" Dynamic Wheels and more to come......... |
||
2nd Jan 2009 12:08 pm |
|
SteveNorman Member Since: 18 Sep 2008 Location: somerset Posts: 18 |
This isn't true, as the engine management system still has the same safety parameters set, if a tuning box is set too high, it will exceed those safety parameters & flag a fault, usually of fuel rail pressure deviation too great. The tuning box is designed to work within these parameters, but obviously at the upper end, instead of the lower.
Tuning boxes on common rail diesel engines can't function if they are "2p resistors". Most now are digital & use a microprocessor, as even the older analogue ones don't react fast enough & cause fault codes/limp home. Diesels don't have a lambda sensor. As for fuel consumption, well usually you find that the econimy is better as you tend to have more torque for normal driving. If you drive it flat out all the time, then the increased power uses more fuel, but on average, they usually save fuel. The problem with a tuning box is it can only vary fuel quantity, (but does it extremely well), so is not so good an option as remapping. The advantage is it's quick & easy to fit ( & remove), is undetectable when removed, & you can reflash the main ecu for the manufacturers improvements, which are sometimes quite great, in terms of driveability. A remap should be the best idea, BUT, there are a huge amount of remaps which haven't been even tried on a vehicle, some have had a basic remap, then the vehicle put on a rolling road & then fiddled with. Very few have had the man hours spent on them that they should. When the manufacturer updates it's management software, this should be the benchmark to then improve on, thus you reflash your ecu with updated software, then give that to the remapper, to put their tune back on. Time consuming, & has to be paid for, either by the original cost of your remap, or additional charges. Regards Steve |
||
2nd Jan 2009 4:00 pm |
|
MVS Member Since: 06 Nov 2008 Location: Back under my favourite rock Posts: 267 |
I realise this and was generalising wildly. As spotting the good sytems from the poor ones is a minefield for the average punter I had the Piggy Back Ralliart system on my last Shogun which did as you describe increase fuel efficiency by increasing torque for general driving and the car felt all the better for it. The difference being it was supplied fitted, and warranted by the UK Mitsubishi Importers. |
||
2nd Jan 2009 4:43 pm |
|
Mav71 Member Since: 15 Nov 2008 Location: Leicester Posts: 2575 |
The good thing about Superchips Bluefin, is that if the dealer re-flashes the ECU with the latest Land Rover Software, you simply re-read the ECU with Bluefin and Superchips will then re-do your re-map based on the new software free of charge.
|
||
2nd Jan 2009 8:22 pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis