Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > General > Fuel Range Indication |
|
|
grod Member Since: 05 Dec 2015 Location: Branxton Posts: 110 |
not sure if its normal but my DTE when filled sohws 999kms. Every now and then it itself and indicates something else but I don't worry about it. Sometimes the gauge only reads 1/2 full but sorts itself out in time, if not, I pull the + lead off the battery to reset and all is good.
|
||
18th Sep 2017 3:16 am |
|
Stuartc Member Since: 01 Dec 2014 Location: Perth, Australia Posts: 2292 |
Did you reset the trip before leaving fuel station?
|
||
18th Sep 2017 6:20 am |
|
Lightwater Member Since: 21 Aug 2014 Location: Sydney Northern Beaches Posts: 4906 |
Mine being petrol, I carry around a handful of spare 10L tanks!
|
||||
18th Sep 2017 7:09 am |
|
Jimboland Member Since: 06 Dec 2015 Location: Northants Posts: 734 |
There are too many unknown variables for it to give anything more than an approximate estimation. These include; no actual measure of the amount of fuel put into the tank, fuel slopping around in the tank making it difficult to estimate the quantity, historic mpg achieved and current mpg which of course is also very variable depending where when and how you drive. I've had mine running when the indication has fallen below zero but I usually fill up until the pump stops when the fuel gauge shows 1/4 full. One one recent fill it indicated around 390 miles but after a 10 or so miles on a really easy run it went up to over 600 miles. Once back to normal driving and traffic it went baack to the usual indications.
|
||
18th Sep 2017 9:37 am |
|
RogB Member Since: 16 Dec 2014 Location: Mansfield Posts: 3880 |
as with anything else in this technological era such as various apps on phones etc... they are just really intended as a guide and not intended to be taken as 100% true. But everyone thinks they are totally accurate. The same goes with range calculators on all cars now.
|
||
18th Sep 2017 9:52 am |
|
jenks1950 Member Since: 20 Apr 2013 Location: Stevenage Posts: 258 |
The trouble with all these "predictive" features, is that unless you know and understand how their calculations are made, they are virtually useless. I find the ETA feature on the satnav annoying as it seems to factor in your journey to date as well, which might seem like a good idea, but just complicates things so much that you are better making your own judgements
|
||
18th Sep 2017 10:10 am |
|
RogB Member Since: 16 Dec 2014 Location: Mansfield Posts: 3880 |
common sense to be applied at all time I guess. Do you really want to turn right down that 1 way street because your sat nav tells you to? do you really believe that there are actually only 5 miles left in your tank but its only 2 miles to the nearest garage so you don't worry ?
|
||
18th Sep 2017 10:44 am |
|
DirtyDuck Member Since: 11 Sep 2017 Location: Wessex Posts: 192 |
I never take these as gospel, but in my 5 series, it takes a much more long term view, so while it can clearly vary and be wrong, especially if you move from short to long journeys and vice versa, in doesn't adjust wildly.
|
||
18th Sep 2017 1:47 pm |
|
DirtyDuck Member Since: 11 Sep 2017 Location: Wessex Posts: 192 |
Have you tried the Fuelly App - looks right up your street. http://www.fuelly.com/ I only use when I get a new car to see how accurate the OBC is, as I can't be bothered otherwise. Once upon a time (when I had an Austin Allegro - oh yes!) I recorded it all in a pocket book and worked it out by hand. Excel hadn't been invented, or Windows, nor the internet, never mind Fuelly.com. |
||||
18th Sep 2017 1:52 pm |
|
Lunar-Rover Member Since: 15 Jun 2017 Location: Bolton Lancashire Posts: 109 |
Same with mine, it has only once gone above 385 range to 420 for a very short time, where as on a VW Passat estate I once owned was very accurate to within 20 miles distance covered to indicated start range. REME .. Rough Engineering Made Easy |
||
19th Sep 2017 6:02 pm |
|
Jimboland Member Since: 06 Dec 2015 Location: Northants Posts: 734 |
Been shopping; had been parked for over an hour in a nice flat car park, got back in the car and started the engine and the range indication was 398. Was about to start off when SWMBO "lost" something and had to search her handbag before I was allowed to set off. So I sat there for over ten minutes with the engine running (I know I shouldn't have left it running but it was the only way to show I was ready and we were wasting time) and during this time the range indication increased several times eventually getting to 409. Eventually we set off and everything worked as normal with the range indication falling by about 30 miles over the journey home which was 30ish miles.
|
||
23rd Sep 2017 10:17 am |
|
alex_pescaru Member Since: 12 Mar 2009 Location: RO Posts: 4642 |
The algorithm is as follows:
|
||
23rd Sep 2017 2:19 pm |
|
DirtyDuck Member Since: 11 Sep 2017 Location: Wessex Posts: 192 |
Thanks all - the last post sounds highly plausible - it's very biased towards recent consumption rather than, say the last 100 or 150 miles. Pro's and cons, but the main thing is 1) to understand it and make best use of it, knowing it's limitations 2) I know it's not faulty. |
||
25th Sep 2017 9:39 am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis