Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > General > MOT |
|
|
Steve D Member Since: 19 Jan 2013 Location: Essexshire Posts: 4109 |
And vice versa! If, for example, you removed your front bumper, exposing some sharp edges that could do serious damage to a pedestrian if you hit them, then you would quite rightly be nicked. I think the same may also apply to bonnet mascots as they were deemed a danger to pedestrians. However, a car can only fail the mot for exposed sharp edges if they were caused by accident damage or corrosion, so that car would pass! There are other examples where construction and use regs do not seem to be in line with mot regs. Past: FL2 TD4 HSE Auto
|
||
1st Feb 2016 4:19 am |
|
RedMike Member Since: 15 Dec 2015 Location: Hereford Posts: 92 |
If mine failed because the air bag light was inop, I would drive it away to get it fixed. If it failed due to "poor braking efficiency" or a similar un-roadworthy related defect which could cause harm to self or others then I would not drive it away. LR Freelander 2 2014 metropolis SD4 auto in Loire Blue.
|
||
2nd Feb 2016 8:09 am |
|
Reeventu Member Since: 16 Jan 2011 Location: Hampshire Posts: 237 |
Whether we agree or not surely an MOT failure by default means in the eyes of the law it is unroadworthy ?
|
||
2nd Feb 2016 9:50 am |
|
RedMike Member Since: 15 Dec 2015 Location: Hereford Posts: 92 |
For something that is so important (MOT test) and has a direct bearing on the safety of people, the rules / regulations have too many grey areas IMO.
|
||
2nd Feb 2016 12:30 pm |
|
Landiroamer Member Since: 30 Apr 2015 Location: Devon Posts: 1185 |
I think a cracked number plate can be a failure even? if not it will certainly get an advisory mention you ought to get it fixed type of thing.
|
||
2nd Feb 2016 12:44 pm |
|
RogB Member Since: 16 Dec 2014 Location: Mansfield Posts: 3880 |
Ive never understood why the law enforcement etc harass and chase and threaten if you are driving without tax which has no impact on road safety or threat to life, and yet a car could get away with not having an MOT and there be no follow up action unless physically caught.
|
||
2nd Feb 2016 1:16 pm |
|
Steve D Member Since: 19 Jan 2013 Location: Essexshire Posts: 4109 |
I can see your point but in that scenario, unless you went to the inconvenience and expense of paying a private contractor to lift and transport your vehicle to a site that would be carrying out the repair, you would effectively be handing the MOT station a blank cheque as they could charge you what they liked for the repair if it was law that you could not legally drive that car from their premises. There would also be the question what you would do if the testing station didn't undertake repairs - many, including local council stations, do not carry out repairs and no mot station is under any obligation to do so. On the other side of the coin, you could argue that you drove it there, unknowingly, with defective brakes so driving it away while being aware would put you in a safer position. It's very complicated and because of that, not practically enforceable. Past: FL2 TD4 HSE Auto Evoque SD4 Dynamic Lux Auto Present: Audi A3 S Line. |
||
2nd Feb 2016 1:53 pm |
|
RedMike Member Since: 15 Dec 2015 Location: Hereford Posts: 92 |
I see What you are saying Steve. I guess I am lucky in that being connected to the MV trade all my working life, my cars are tested at a garage I know and trust. Some don't have that luxury and may call coul of the scenario you described. LR Freelander 2 2014 metropolis SD4 auto in Loire Blue.
|
||
2nd Feb 2016 5:30 pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis