Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > Technical > FL2 aerial change |
|
|
mork Member Since: 25 Sep 2007 Location: Berks Posts: 32 |
The bump on the roof is for the Satnav system, or cars fitted with one. Aeriel I believe is on the rear window or possibly one of the side windows. Hope this helps |
||
12th Apr 2008 10:41 am |
|
xxtrail Member Since: 14 Mar 2008 Location: Devon Posts: 142 |
Thanks Mork , I don't doubt what you say, but your answer amazes me. Why do they need an external aerial on an integrated sat nav that's got limitations, when the audio can manage with a window aerial like on mine, and my Garmin 760 performs perfectly in the same sat nav cubby without any form of external aerial to the device, other than Traffic, never mind to the extremeties of the car. Was GS TD4 Auto, Privacy, Santorini with Tundra & Alpaca, Cold Climate Pack. Traded for Discovery Sport HSE Auto. |
||
12th Apr 2008 11:02 am |
|
arcturus Member Since: 23 Jan 2008 Location: Tenbury Wells, Worcestershire Posts: 39 |
Mork is spot on. The sat nav antenna has to have a clear view of the sky in order to work. If it was inside the car, then the metalwork of the body would shield the signal and the sat nav wouldn't work properly. If you look around, many modern cars now sport a small fin on the roof for this very reason.
|
||
12th Apr 2008 12:15 pm |
|
Cameo Member Since: 11 Jan 2008 Location: South Coast Posts: 26 |
I'm not convinced that the 'bump' is solely for vehicles fitted with SatNav. My XS has a bump but is not fitted with SatNav, it does however have DAB and telephone integration. Perhaps these two items use it too? |
||
12th Apr 2008 1:30 pm |
|
Tim in Scotland Member Since: 12 Mar 2006 Location: All at sea Posts: 875 |
It can also be for the PTI as an external antenna, but I'm not sure about the DAB as the antenna in the side screen is a "smart" one and it may be OK for the DAB as well How can carbon have a footprint, it has no feet?
|
||
12th Apr 2008 1:59 pm |
|
xxtrail Member Since: 14 Mar 2008 Location: Devon Posts: 142 |
Thanks also to arcturus , yes I know where satellites are and some are low horizon, and in theory you are correct in that you would expect an external aerial to give better performance.
|
||
12th Apr 2008 2:04 pm |
|
chicken george Member Since: 05 Dec 2007 Location: N. Yorks Posts: 13291 |
My garmin works fine in the fl2 but not in my house. At work
|
||
12th Apr 2008 2:58 pm |
|
xxtrail Member Since: 14 Mar 2008 Location: Devon Posts: 142 |
It must be the combination of Garmin and Santorini CG, it probably wouldn't work in a Stornoway FL2 Was GS TD4 Auto, Privacy, Santorini with Tundra & Alpaca, Cold Climate Pack. Traded for Discovery Sport HSE Auto. |
||
12th Apr 2008 3:11 pm |
|
Tandemman Member Since: 30 Jun 2007 Location: Barnsley Posts: 686 |
My TomTom worked poorly in the cubby until I pushed it right to the back it works better there as it is then underneath the hole in the metal under the fake speaker grille, better reception I suppose |
||
12th Apr 2008 4:28 pm |
|
ChrisC Member Since: 20 Feb 2008 Location: Essex Posts: 79 |
The Hump is 100% a sat nav aerial, but the FL2 has no need for a phone aerial, because the hand sets aerial is used, after all the Land Rover PTI is just a big bluetooth headset. However satnav and phone aerial are normally combined, so I can see the reason for argument. Some manufactures will fit sat nav aerials without sat nav since it saves having two roof panels in production.
|
||
12th Apr 2008 4:34 pm |
|
chicken george Member Since: 05 Dec 2007 Location: N. Yorks Posts: 13291 |
On GPS accuracy, The latest thing in farming is self steering tractors to ensure accurate driving when using wide machines in the field. (to expensive for my scale of farming ). To get GPS accuracy of less than 10cm (I think) farmers install a triangulation mast in the corner of the field for the tractors GPS to cross check against the satellites. At work
|
||
12th Apr 2008 4:52 pm |
|
avtur Member Since: 11 Nov 2006 Location: Stockport Posts: 1306 |
My experience of in car sat nav is similar to xxtrail, have always found in car sat reception to be remarkably good, and have never resorted to external aerial (including my original Go 300 which is pre SirfsetIII) Also have never mounted my satnavs on their standard windscreen mounts, I've always mounted them much further away from the windscreen, but never had reception problems. The issue of reflective coatings on the screens of Pug's and Renaults is well documented but doesn't seem to defeat the latest generation receivers. Regards radio reception on the FL2, pretty disgusted with the standard radio in my GS, very poor on the move, have had the discussion with the dealer about aerials and was told that only one of the side windows at the rear is connected to the (normal FM) radio |
||
12th Apr 2008 5:35 pm |
|
Dave Member Since: 04 Jul 2007 Location: Somewhere Near You Posts: 2666 |
Sorry to PS on your bonfire but my NUVI250W works just fine in a STORNOWAY GREY FL2, no external antenna needed ______________________ 2011 Full Fat RR 4.4 TDV8 2012 FL2 SD4 Auto HSE 2013 Kawasaki Versys 650 |
||
12th Apr 2008 5:38 pm |
|
chicken george Member Since: 05 Dec 2007 Location: N. Yorks Posts: 13291 |
Sat-navs in North-Yorkshire work with no antennae at all because we are so close to heaven At work
|
||
12th Apr 2008 9:55 pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis