![]() |
|
Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
![]() | Home > General > Best 235/60 R18 ATR/Semi ATR Tyres? |
![]() ![]() |
|
|
AiiEEX Member Since: 30 Sep 2010 Location: Norfolk way Posts: 642 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi Alex.
|
||
![]() |
|
alexs_82 Member Since: 16 May 2013 Location: Sussex Posts: 6 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks! They look pretty good. Does anyone have any experience with them in the 235 size? Interested in road noise/mpg changes? |
||
![]() |
|
mikehzz Member Since: 04 Sep 2009 Location: Springwood Posts: 749 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I saw a set of those in 19's on a Disco 4 last weekend. They were very good indeed. I would buy them. |
||
![]() |
|
alexs_82 Member Since: 16 May 2013 Location: Sussex Posts: 6 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Can anyone who has these let me know about mpg changes? Don't want to lower it too much!
|
||
![]() |
|
pab Member Since: 28 Aug 2012 Location: Now in Mid-Wales Posts: 2007 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I've recently fitted a set of these in 235/65/17. Only done a bit over 1,000 miles on them so far, and nothing challenging, but first impressions are good. Too soon to say, really, on fuel consumption, but I haven't noticed a significant drop. |
||
![]() |
|
2freel2 Member Since: 04 Jan 2011 Location: durham, uk Posts: 36 ![]() ![]() |
I always found the standard goodyears very competent in snow and on ice, never got stuck in any field either though i didnt go mud plugging in them. got 30k miles out of each of two separate sets.
|
||
![]() |
|
chapsworth Member Since: 03 Jan 2012 Location: Canterbury Posts: 225 ![]() ![]() |
I've had them on for about 500 miles in 235/60x18 size. No change in noise or mpg that I can notice.
|
||
![]() |
|
alexs_82 Member Since: 16 May 2013 Location: Sussex Posts: 6 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks for all your replies, really helpful.
|
||
![]() |
|
pab Member Since: 28 Aug 2012 Location: Now in Mid-Wales Posts: 2007 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I doubt that you'd be disappointed with either (although I have no direct experience of the Michelins). Michelins are more road-oriented, and have a better wet braking rating. Grabbers should be better off road, and have the advantage of being a bit cheaper, but a worse wet braking rating. |
||
![]() |
|
alexs_82 Member Since: 16 May 2013 Location: Sussex Posts: 6 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks Pab. The main issue for me is loss of mpg, and increased road noise (assuming I went for the grabber at) But doesn't seem to be too much of an issue based on people's replies, so will give them a go! |
||
![]() |
|
Aero_383 Member Since: 05 Sep 2012 Location: Sussex Posts: 586 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hello Alex
|
||
![]() |
|
alexs_82 Member Since: 16 May 2013 Location: Sussex Posts: 6 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hello! Thanks for that, gave him a call earlier and spoke about the grabber at's, however doing a bit more research I've decided to go for the Michelin latitude cross, they seem to be a great compromise as I want to keep the noise low and mpg high, whilst also having decent (semi) atr tyres. Unfortunately Andy didn't have any of these in stock ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Aero_383 Member Since: 05 Sep 2012 Location: Sussex Posts: 586 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Good luck with those. No experience of them myself. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
![](../images/layout/footer/disclaimer.gif)