Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > General > to free or not to range; that’s the question… |
|
|
simon Member Since: 20 Feb 2006 Location: The Countryside Posts: 271 |
If you can afford a TDV8 RRS then go for it. If its too big then get the Freelander 2
|
||
4th Dec 2006 11:53 am |
|
Tim in Scotland Member Since: 12 Mar 2006 Location: All at sea Posts: 875 |
RRS TDv6 is a really nice car depends on whether you want more interior space of the RRS or not. You will save a packet buying a fully specced up F2 HSE with extras over an RRS SE though. Cannot comment on the performance of the F2 as I haven't yet driven one, but I find the TDv6 has plenty of go and is very quiet and smooth. Fuel mileage is in a different league though - I average about 28-30mpg in mixed A road and motorway driving with no commuting, I hope the F2 TD4 will do much better than that, it should be able to achieve into the high 30's mpg How can carbon have a footprint, it has no feet?
|
||
4th Dec 2006 4:49 pm |
|
BOOWHO Member Since: 04 Oct 2006 Location: UK Posts: 34 |
I have a feeling we are gon to be dissappointed with mpg Tim, autoexpress on test with a TD4 averaged 28.4. I know they probably roast the living daylights out of the car but even so! This was a manual so what do you think we will acheive with the automatic? |
||
4th Dec 2006 8:50 pm |
|
simon Member Since: 20 Feb 2006 Location: The Countryside Posts: 271 |
best advice is not to believe nearly everything AutoExess write.
|
||
4th Dec 2006 10:57 pm |
|
jollyjack Member Since: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Scotland Posts: 1 |
Crumbs I could get better than that in a TD6 Range Rover in everyday driving! |
||
4th Dec 2006 10:59 pm |
|
G4LAND Member Since: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Mexico City Posts: 183 |
I will request a drive test on a RRS TDV6. Do you think it has beater performance than my FLsport TD4?
|
||
5th Dec 2006 8:39 am |
|
pelyma Member Since: 19 Feb 2006 Location: Patching Posts: 366 |
Well I hoofed it round on the test drive and the computer went from 29mpg to nearly 31mpg and that included a 3 mile run at 90mph (shhh) |
||
5th Dec 2006 8:51 am |
|
Scottie Member Since: 19 Sep 2006 Location: Dunblane/Inverness Posts: 66 |
was in speaking to my dealer on Saturday just finalising a few things ready for collecting our Freelander this Thursday.
|
||
5th Dec 2006 9:09 am |
|
Tim in Scotland Member Since: 12 Mar 2006 Location: All at sea Posts: 875 |
The downloadable brochure on www.freelander2.co.uk has a fuel economy page and that states
|
||
5th Dec 2006 9:09 am |
|
qzx372 Member Since: 13 Nov 2006 Location: North Yorkshire Posts: 54 |
My FL1 TD4 averaged 31-32 mpg throughout its 4 1/2 years that i had it. The official figure was 37 mpg. The Xtrail i have now averages 32 against official 37.7 (up from 28 since an ecu fix).
|
||
5th Dec 2006 9:37 am |
|
BOOWHO Member Since: 04 Oct 2006 Location: UK Posts: 34 |
Maybe so Simon on subjects like the Iosis but I see no reason for them to prevaricate the fuel consumption figures, another 4x4 mag said getting over 30mpg proves difficult , they would do more test but they were initially dissapointed. And Scottie, if a sales person told me the average was 38mpg showing on the computer I would want to see it (just for peace of mind really no offence to sales persons |
||
6th Dec 2006 3:41 pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis